2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing oil recovery from low-permeability reservoirs with a self-adaptive polymer: A proof-of-concept study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that the hydrophobically modified polymer had better properties for application in EOR. Similar studies were also performed by Zhang et al (2019), who noted that the injection of HMAP in porous media increased the oil recovery factor by 18.7% compared to PHPA injection. Abirov et al (2019) performed porous media tests with commercial PHPA and HMAP solutions simulating conditions of the Turgay Southern Basin reservoir in Kazakhstan, where severe salinity and temperature conditions prevail (92 000 ppm TDS and 82°C).…”
Section: Hydrophobically Modified Associative Polymers (Hmaps)supporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They concluded that the hydrophobically modified polymer had better properties for application in EOR. Similar studies were also performed by Zhang et al (2019), who noted that the injection of HMAP in porous media increased the oil recovery factor by 18.7% compared to PHPA injection. Abirov et al (2019) performed porous media tests with commercial PHPA and HMAP solutions simulating conditions of the Turgay Southern Basin reservoir in Kazakhstan, where severe salinity and temperature conditions prevail (92 000 ppm TDS and 82°C).…”
Section: Hydrophobically Modified Associative Polymers (Hmaps)supporting
confidence: 75%
“…In general, hydrophobically modified polymers have better thermal stability, salinity tolerance and oil recovery efficiency than unmodified polymers. Thus, they can be considered promising viscosifying agents for EOR in reservoirs with harsh conditions (high salinity and temperature) (El-Hoshoudy et al, 2017a;Liu et al, 2017a;Zhang et al, 2019). Table 1 shows the summary of the main scientific developments in this area and the evolution of the studies.…”
Section: Hydrophobically Modified Associative Polymers (Hmaps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many scholars have studied and summarized the relationship between core injection capacity and relevant parameters such as pressure difference, resistance coefficient, and residual resistance coefficient through a large number of core displacement experiments. The injection capacity is judged from the stability degree of pressure, resistance coefficient, and residual resistance coefficient with the increase in injected PV number, and it is generally believed that the injection capacity of the displacement agent is poor when the injection pressure is high and good when the injection pressure is low, 47‐49 but these evaluation standards only analyze the injection situation from the total change trend, and there is no accurate range to specifically define the injection capacity for the actual displacement situation. According to these related research studies and combined with the main parameters such as injection pressure and produced fluid, 38 groups of experiments were carried out through laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, the most common evaluation methods used to measure polymers are SLS and viscometry. [ 38,39 ] In this study, static light scattering (SLS) was adopted to measure M W of CHPAM and HPAM. At the same time, the obtained other parameters, expected molecular weight, including second virial coefficient (A 2 ) and the radius of gyration ( R g ), could be utilized to evaluate the molecular diameter and flexibility of the polymer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%