2006
DOI: 10.1080/10528008.2006.11488931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Reflective Learning through Role-Plays: The Use of an Effective Sales Presentation Evaluation Form in Student Role-Plays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the ultimate result of a successful presentation. This innovative framework provides a holistic approach in assessing a student's performance based on the content and the delivery of their presentation (Carroll, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the ultimate result of a successful presentation. This innovative framework provides a holistic approach in assessing a student's performance based on the content and the delivery of their presentation (Carroll, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recommendations included discussions with the instructor, the number of presentations per semester, as well as dress rehearsals. In addition, research has suggested how student presentations should be evaluated by instructors and their peers (Carroll 2006). To our knowledge, no marketing article addresses the modified Pecha Kucha presentation style in undergraduate marketing courses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the findings highlight the active role of language learners in the feedback process: they need to generate feedback from multiple sources such as the teacher, peers, and themselves (Nicol 2010). The teachers' beliefs are also shared by other researchers who argue that triangulating multiple feedback sources contributes to much learning reflection among students (Carroll 2006), and encourages high-level engagement in the feedback processes on the student part (Cheng and Warren 2005).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%