2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing reproducibility in developmental EEG research: BIDS, cluster-based permutation tests, and effect sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this was an exploratory analysis, we targeted a broad time window, between 16 200 and 500 ms. For statistical assessment, we performed sample by sample paired t-tests between the mean visual-evoked ERPs at the Oz electrode between burst and no-burst. We used a cluster-based permutation test procedure (100,000 randomisations) to correct p-values (Maris & Oostenveld, 2007;Meyer et al, 2021). Fig.…”
Section: Erp Analyses Time-locked To Visual Stimulus and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this was an exploratory analysis, we targeted a broad time window, between 16 200 and 500 ms. For statistical assessment, we performed sample by sample paired t-tests between the mean visual-evoked ERPs at the Oz electrode between burst and no-burst. We used a cluster-based permutation test procedure (100,000 randomisations) to correct p-values (Maris & Oostenveld, 2007;Meyer et al, 2021). Fig.…”
Section: Erp Analyses Time-locked To Visual Stimulus and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permutation based statistics were used when number of statistical comparisons was deemed too high for correction using the Bonferroni‐Holm method and are common in analyzing multidimensional data sets such as EEG spectrograms (Meyer et al., 2021). When calculating the difference between two‐dimensional maps of probabilities of activity levels (Figures 3b and c, 7f, and 10c and f), the observed differences were compared with the differences from a series of 10,000 permutations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the statistical assessment of the α-power imbalance over time between attended left and attended right trials, we performed a cluster-based permutation test procedure (100,000 randomisations) for each participant and at the group-level (one-tailed permutation test) (Maris and Oostenveld 2007; Meyer et al 2021). We assessed that lateralisation indexes for attended-right and attended-left trials were significantly two different distributions by applying a one-tailed t-test (independent samples) with α-level = 0.05 for each participant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%