Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial?

Abstract

There is a need for effective methods to teach critical thinking (CT). One instructional method that seems promising is comparing correct and erroneous worked examples (i.e., contrasting examples). The aim of the present study, therefore, was to investigate the effect of contrasting examples on learning and transfer of CT-skills, focusing on avoiding biased reasoning. Students (N = 170) received instructions on CT and avoiding biases in reasoning tasks, followed by: (1) contrasting examples, (2) correct examples, (3) erroneous examples, or (4) practice problems. Performance was measured on a pretest, immediate posttest, 3-week delayed posttest, and 9-month delayed posttest. Our results revealed that participants’ reasoning task performance improved from pretest to immediate posttest, and even further after a delay (i.e., they learned to avoid biased reasoning). Surprisingly, there were no differences in learning gains or transfer performance between the four conditions. Our findings raise questions about the preconditions of contrasting examples effects. Moreover, how transfer of CT-skills can be fostered remains an important issue for future research.

The theoretical framework on humanist ethno-metaphorical mathematics learning model: An impactful insight in learning mathematics

“…Mathematical critical thinking ability is the ability to use the thinking ability actively and rationally with full awareness and to consider and evaluate information (Hendriana, 2017a;Han et al, 2021;Van Peppen et al, 2021). The indicators of this ability include the following: the ability to identify and justify concepts or the ability to provide rationale for conceptual mastery; the ability to generalize or the ability to complete supporting data or information; and the ability to analyze an algorithm or the ability to evaluate or examine an algorithm.…”

Implications of Computational Thinking Knowledge Transfer for Developing Educational Interventions

“…"Bo-peep" theory that states that KT will take place spontaneously and automatically (Kassab, 2021); 2. "Good shepherd" theory, which suggests that when KT is provoked, practiced and reflected upon is easy to achieve (Gordon & Doyle, 2015;Salomon & Perkins, 1989;van Peppen et al, 2021), these two positions generate two conditions: generalization and maintenance of acquired learning and the indicator of adaptability; and…”

Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Prospective Physics Teacher

“…The factor that makes this ability low for prospective physics teachers is: Lack of basic mathematical abilities of prospective physics teachers greatly affects their ability to check errors in mathematical operations that have been carried out, this then has a vital effect in confirming assumptions in questions that must be supported through data processing (Peppen, 2021;Trisnawaty, 2017;Wulan, et al, 2017). The lack of direct experience that prospective physics teachers have gone through in the process of solving daily problems (one of the characteristics of HOTS questions) actually makes them confused in determining and criticizing which methods are more effective.…”

“…For any content domain (not just in physics), we usually want students to know some facts and concepts and also to be able to think and reason with these facts and concepts in some way. Every time students try to solve new problems or do original thinking with their knowledge, they transfer and change what they learn, so their understanding grows (Bloom, 2015;Heong, et al, 2012;Peppen, et al, 2021) The (Bloom, 2015;Hyder & Bhamani, 2016). The Cognitive Process dimension is very similar to the original Bloom's taxonomy except that the order of the last two categories is reversed.…”