2015
DOI: 10.1021/es503385d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Surface Methane Fluxes from an Oligotrophic Lake: Exploring the Microbubble Hypothesis

Abstract: Exchange of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4)across inland water surfaces is an important component of the terrestrial carbon (C) balance. We investigated the fluxes of these two gases across the surface of oligotrophic Lake Stechlin using a floating chamber approach. The normalized gas transfer rate for CH4 (k600,CH4) was on average 2.5 times higher than that for CO2 (k600,CO2) and consequently higher than Fickian transport. Because of its low solubility relative to CO2, the enhanced C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
106
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
106
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, compared to a simple diffusion process, it also increases the transfer rates of methane to the lake surface, as the ascension of the bubbles is faster than the diffusion towards the top of the water column. The microbubble phenomenon has recently been proposed as an important flux pathway for CH 4 in inland aquatic systems (Beaulieu et al, 20 2012;McGinnis et al, 2015;Prairie and del Giorgio, 2013). Here, this process results in a CH 4 emission that is two orders of magnitude greater than previously reported for these environments.…”
Section: O 2 Bubble Point and Methane Emissionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…On the other hand, compared to a simple diffusion process, it also increases the transfer rates of methane to the lake surface, as the ascension of the bubbles is faster than the diffusion towards the top of the water column. The microbubble phenomenon has recently been proposed as an important flux pathway for CH 4 in inland aquatic systems (Beaulieu et al, 20 2012;McGinnis et al, 2015;Prairie and del Giorgio, 2013). Here, this process results in a CH 4 emission that is two orders of magnitude greater than previously reported for these environments.…”
Section: O 2 Bubble Point and Methane Emissionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Third, another important mechanism stopping methane from reaching the ocean surface is the dissolution of bubbles into the ocean water. Although bubbling is the most efficient way to transfer methane from the seabed to the atmosphere, the fraction of bubbles actually reaching the atmosphere is very uncertain and critically depends on emission depths (< 100-200 m, McGinnis et al, 2015) and on the size of the bubbles (> 5-8 mm; James et al, 2016). Finally, surface oceans are aerobic and contribute to the oxidation of dissolved methane (USEPA, 2010a).…”
Section: Oceanic Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in the latter case, there is still uncertainty about how much methane will reach the atmosphere and how much is oxidized. 54,55 With the methane source located in the upper oxic layer instead of the bottom (Figure 1), methane needs to be transported over only a much shorter distance to reach the water−air interface. Additionally, shallow water mixing (convection), which often occurs diurnally, both exposes higher methane concentrations to the air−water interface and enhances k. 53 These fluxes would be particularly important during periods of colder weather and higher winds during the stratified season and would be further elevated by microbubbles.…”
Section: ■ Implications For Lake-to-air Methane Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%