2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the forecasting power of exchange rate models by introducing nonlinearity: Does it work?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the forecasting of exchange rate has been largely conducted on the basis of the structural "models of the 1970s;" Frenkel-Bilson (Frenkel, 1976;Bilson, 1978), Dornbusch-Frankel (Dornbusch, 1976;Frankel, 1979) and Hooper-Morton (Hooper 8 and Morton, 1982) asset models (see Meese and Rogoff, 1983 for more expositions of the models). These theoretical models capture the predictive power of such variables as relative money supplies, relative incomes, short-term interest rate differentials and relative prices among others for exchange rate forecasting (see Moosa and Burns, 2014a;Moosa and Burns, 2014b;Moosa and Burns, 2014c;Burns and Moosa, 2015;Ahmed, et al 2016 for empirical literatures).…”
Section: A Review Of the Literature On Exchange Rate Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the forecasting of exchange rate has been largely conducted on the basis of the structural "models of the 1970s;" Frenkel-Bilson (Frenkel, 1976;Bilson, 1978), Dornbusch-Frankel (Dornbusch, 1976;Frankel, 1979) and Hooper-Morton (Hooper 8 and Morton, 1982) asset models (see Meese and Rogoff, 1983 for more expositions of the models). These theoretical models capture the predictive power of such variables as relative money supplies, relative incomes, short-term interest rate differentials and relative prices among others for exchange rate forecasting (see Moosa and Burns, 2014a;Moosa and Burns, 2014b;Moosa and Burns, 2014c;Burns and Moosa, 2015;Ahmed, et al 2016 for empirical literatures).…”
Section: A Review Of the Literature On Exchange Rate Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the accurate prediction of exchange rate returns, exchange market literature has been examining the usefulness of various fundamental human and economic variables, while different methodologies and econometric techniques have also been explored (Burns & Moosa, 2015; Cheung et al, 2005; Kilian, 1999; Kilian & Taylor, 2003; Meese & Rogoff, 1983; Pilbeam & Langeland, 2015; Rossi, 2013). Rossi (2013) suggested that traditional fundamentals, such as inflation, interest rates, net foreign assets and output, and money differentials, show fluctuating degrees of out‐of‐sample predictive ability for exchange rate movements (Galimberti & Moura, 2013; Molodtsova & Papell, 2009).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study falls into the same trap as some others (e.g. Meese, Rogoff (1983) [1] , Burns, Moosa (2015) [35] , Chinn (1991 [26] , 2010 [25] )) in attempting to explain and suggest that technicalities ("error correction mechanism", "adjustment to disequilibria", "adjustment speed", "non-linearity") somehow have something to do with forecasting exchange rates outside of the known data.…”
Section: No Improvements In Model Outcomes When Compared To Random Walkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study [35] by Burns and Moosa (2015) examines whether introduction non-linearity would improve the "forecasting power" of exchange rate models. We agree with the findings that the "Meese-Rogoff puzzle" cannot be explained by introducing non-linearity, or by introducing any other gimmick into a model.…”
Section: No Improvements In Model Outcomes When Compared To Random Walkmentioning
confidence: 99%