2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Water Sampling in Free Energy Calculations with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo

Abstract: The prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using free energy perturbation (FEP) is becoming increasingly routine in structure-based drug discovery. Most FEP packages use molecular dynamics (MD) to sample the configurations of proteins and ligands, as MD is well-suited to capturing coupled motion. However, MD can be prohibitively inefficient at sampling water molecules that are buried within binding sites, which has severely limited the domain of applicability of FEP and its prospective usage in drug d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
106
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For peptides, FEP can compute the RBFE between a wild-type and point mutant (ΔΔG FEP ) via an “alchemical transformation” that “mutates” the wild-type (WT) sidechain to the mutant sidechain through a series of intermediates known as λ windows ( Figure 1 ) [ 16 , 17 ]. Notably, FEP incorporates sampling of all degrees of freedom via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to account for conformational variations in ligand–receptor interactions and permits the displacement and introduction of explicit waters during the simulation [ 18 ]. This contrasts with the widely used molecular mechanics–generalized born/surface area (MM-GB/SA) method, in which no alchemical transformation is performed, a static structure is used, and an implicit representation of the solvent is employed [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For peptides, FEP can compute the RBFE between a wild-type and point mutant (ΔΔG FEP ) via an “alchemical transformation” that “mutates” the wild-type (WT) sidechain to the mutant sidechain through a series of intermediates known as λ windows ( Figure 1 ) [ 16 , 17 ]. Notably, FEP incorporates sampling of all degrees of freedom via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to account for conformational variations in ligand–receptor interactions and permits the displacement and introduction of explicit waters during the simulation [ 18 ]. This contrasts with the widely used molecular mechanics–generalized born/surface area (MM-GB/SA) method, in which no alchemical transformation is performed, a static structure is used, and an implicit representation of the solvent is employed [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected the targets from two recent studies focusing on using enhanced sampling of water motions to improve the accuracy of binding free energy calculations, 30, 31 including several proteins: Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90), Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK), transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 2 (TAF1(2)), and thrombin. In addition to being different receptors, these targets differ in binding site positions, number and occupancy of buried water sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) 3437 shows particular promise for enhancing water sampling and facilitating binding free energy calculations. 31, 38–40, 59–62 In the grand canonical ensemble the chemical potential ( µ ) of the fluctuating species (here, water molecules), the volume and the temperature is constant. The water molecules can be inserted (transferred from) or removed (transferred to) from the system to enhance water sampling — judicious choice of the chemical potential gives an equilibrium between the simulated system and bulk water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prospective free energy calculations were run using Schrödinger FEP+ 7 with a simulation time of 20 ns, 24 λ-windows, and grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) enhanced water sampling. 30…”
Section: Filtering Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%