2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12594-020-1564-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enigma of Dangoaposi and Jagannathpur Lavas of Singhbhum Craton, Eastern India: Possible Solution

Abstract: In the Precambrian Singhbhum stratigraphy, some enigmatic aspects exist as regards to Dangoaposi and Jagannathpur lavas. The existing enigma embodies locational aspects of these lavas, structural characteristics, stratigraphic position, and geochemical affinities. Based on recent field studies by the authors and knowledge acquired from existing literature, a possible solution has been proposed in the present study, which may be followed by Precambrian geologists in order to avoid all existing confusion and dil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Singhbhum Craton of Peninsular India, the following important points are to be noted: (i) the Singhbhum Craton covers an area of ∼39 000 km 2 and forms a N–S elongate ovoid block lying between 84.5 °E to 86.5 °E and 21 °N to 22.75 °N in eastern India. This craton also embraces different rock units ranging in age from 3.5 to 2.5 Ga (Mukhopadhyay, 2001; Matin et al 2012; Sarkar & Gupta, 2012; Mukhopadhyay & Matin, 2020); (ii) The North Singhbhum Mobile Belt is thrust over the Singhbhum Craton along the arcuate Singhbhum Shear Zone, where the Singhbhum Shear Zone has a history of reactivation multiple times; (iii) The stratigraphic succession of the Singhbhum–Orissa Craton has been reported by Saha et al (1988) and Misra (2006) (Table 1); (iv) This stratigraphic succession has scope for further modification considering the availability of geochronological data (Mukhopadhyay & Matin, 2020 and recent studies by other workers; see Table 1); (v) The Iron Ore Group (IOG) basin as a whole comprises three principal sub-parts which are: the western IOG belt (Noamundi–Jamda–Koira basin), eastern IOG belt (Gorumahisani–Badampahar basin) and southern IOG belt (Tomka–Daitari basin) (Fig. 1); (vi) Some important geochronological data for the western IOG include an age of 3392 ± 29 Ma (Basu et al 2008).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Singhbhum Craton of Peninsular India, the following important points are to be noted: (i) the Singhbhum Craton covers an area of ∼39 000 km 2 and forms a N–S elongate ovoid block lying between 84.5 °E to 86.5 °E and 21 °N to 22.75 °N in eastern India. This craton also embraces different rock units ranging in age from 3.5 to 2.5 Ga (Mukhopadhyay, 2001; Matin et al 2012; Sarkar & Gupta, 2012; Mukhopadhyay & Matin, 2020); (ii) The North Singhbhum Mobile Belt is thrust over the Singhbhum Craton along the arcuate Singhbhum Shear Zone, where the Singhbhum Shear Zone has a history of reactivation multiple times; (iii) The stratigraphic succession of the Singhbhum–Orissa Craton has been reported by Saha et al (1988) and Misra (2006) (Table 1); (iv) This stratigraphic succession has scope for further modification considering the availability of geochronological data (Mukhopadhyay & Matin, 2020 and recent studies by other workers; see Table 1); (v) The Iron Ore Group (IOG) basin as a whole comprises three principal sub-parts which are: the western IOG belt (Noamundi–Jamda–Koira basin), eastern IOG belt (Gorumahisani–Badampahar basin) and southern IOG belt (Tomka–Daitari basin) (Fig. 1); (vi) Some important geochronological data for the western IOG include an age of 3392 ± 29 Ma (Basu et al 2008).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…
Fig. 1. Regional map showing disposition of several rock units in the Singhbhum North Orissa region, eastern India (after Saha, 1994; Misra, 2006; Singh et al 2016); marked areas represent investigated sectors: a – Koira sector, b – Gua–Manoharpur sector and c – Sahedba–Santara sector. Inset map shows distribution of different cratons in the Peninsular India (Sharma, 2009); DhC – Dharwar Craton; BaC – Bastar Craton; SiC – Singhbhum Craton; BuC – Bundelkhand Craton; ArC – Aravalli Craton.
…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%