2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enlargement of visual processing regions in social anxiety disorder is related to symptom severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior meta-analyses of voxel-based morphometry studies have shown the following chracteristics for anxiety and depression: a smaller GMV in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) in patients with non-comorbid depression (Du et al, 2012) and patients with non-comorbid anxiety (Shang et al, 2014); an increased GMV in the thalamus and cuneus in patients with non-comorbid depression (Peng et al, 2016a); and a reduced GMV in the middle temporal gyrus and precentral gyrus in patients with anxiety but without comorbid MDD (Shang et al, 2014). Greater GMV in the lingual gyrus, lateral occipital cortex, supplementary motor cortex, premotor cortex, precuneus, and angular gyrus have also been reported in SAD patients (Frick et al, 2014, Irle et al, 2014). A recent meta-analysis showed reduced cortical thickness in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ACC, insula and temporal lobes in MDD patients (Schmaal et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Prior meta-analyses of voxel-based morphometry studies have shown the following chracteristics for anxiety and depression: a smaller GMV in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) in patients with non-comorbid depression (Du et al, 2012) and patients with non-comorbid anxiety (Shang et al, 2014); an increased GMV in the thalamus and cuneus in patients with non-comorbid depression (Peng et al, 2016a); and a reduced GMV in the middle temporal gyrus and precentral gyrus in patients with anxiety but without comorbid MDD (Shang et al, 2014). Greater GMV in the lingual gyrus, lateral occipital cortex, supplementary motor cortex, premotor cortex, precuneus, and angular gyrus have also been reported in SAD patients (Frick et al, 2014, Irle et al, 2014). A recent meta-analysis showed reduced cortical thickness in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ACC, insula and temporal lobes in MDD patients (Schmaal et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…They showed that among healthy subjects, perceived social support was positively associated with the volume over bilateral lingual cortex, posterior parts of posterior cingulate cortex, left occipital lobe and cuneus. Another VBM study conducted among patients with social anxiety disorder revealed that gray matter volume over lingual gyrus was increased in patients and its volume changes were positively associated with symptom severity (Frick et al, 2014 ). An fMRI study also showed that the activity in fusiform gyrus, superior temporal gyrus and lingual gyrus were associated with perception of social dominance from facial postures (Chiao et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To start, differences in GM between SAD-patients and healthy controls have been reported for a number of subcortical, frontal, temporal and parietal regions [ 49 , 50 , 59 , 60 , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] ] – see Table 1 for an overview of MRI-studies on GM in SAD. Furthermore, changes in brain structure were shown to be associated with clinical characteristics [ 49 , 50 , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , 60 , 61 ], while treatment-related changes in brain structure in SAD patients have also been described [ [62] , [63] , [64] ]. Although it should be noted that the findings reported in these studies are heterogeneous (see Table 1 and review by Brühl and colleagues [ 65 ]), and have small effect sizes [ 60 ], a machine learning study was able to discriminate SAD-patients from healthy controls based on GM changes over the whole brain [ 66 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… n.a. Frick et al, 2013 [ 51 ] Whole brain CT using FACE 14 male SAD vs 12 HC = = = = = Meng et al, 2013 [ 53 ] Whole brain VBM (SPM) 20 SAD vs 19 HC - And negative correlation with disease duration = - And positive correlation with age of onset = = Talati et al, 2013 – sample 1 [ 49 ] Whole brain VBM (SPM) 16 SAD vs 20 HC (16 PD) = + = = = Talati et al, 2013 – sample 2 [ 49 ] Whole brain VBM (SPM) 17 SAD vs 17 HC = = = = = Brühl et al, 2014 [ 54 ] Whole brain & ROIs CT FreeSurfer; volumes subcortical ROIs 46 SAD vs 46 HC = = = = = Frick et al, 2014 [ 66 ] Whole brain VBM (SPM) + ROI approach; SVM study 14 SAD vs 12 HC = = = = = Frick et al, 2014 [ 58 ] Whole brain VBM (SPM) 48 SAD vs 29 HC = = = = = Irle et al, 2014 [ 57 ] Whole brain VBM (SPM); manual segmentation parietal ROIs 67 SAD vs 64 HC = = = = = Machado-de-Sousa et al, 2014 [ 194 ] Manual segmentation amygdala & hippocampus 12 SAD, 12 SA, 14 HC + + n.a. n.a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%