The maintenance of human health and the mechanisms by which this is achievedthrough medicine, medical intervention and care-givingare fundamentals of human societies. However, within archaeological discourse, investigations of medicine and care have tended to examine the obvious and explicit manifestations of medical treatment as discrete practices that take place within specific settings, rather than as broader indicators of medical worldviews and health beliefs. In terms of human remains analysis, discussions have generally focused on the identification and diagnosis of palaeopathologies (e.g. Roberts and Manchester [2007]; Grauer [2012]) or unusual examples of surgical intervention (Mogle and Zias 1995;Bernardini et al. 2012;Becker 2014). Material studies have centred on medical implements (Baker 2004; Jackson 1997) with less attention given to investigating the less tangible pharmacopoeia.Matczakm and Chudziak (2018, this volume) provide an excellent summary of the key developments, approaches and sources concerning 'medical archaeology'. As is made clear, the research area is advancing fast, with a large number of high-quality publications being produced in recent years, including the British Archaeological Reports (BAR) Studies in Early Medicine Series that followed from a number of workshops and conferences from the late 1990s. In 2013 Baker published her important Archaeology of Medicine in the Greco-Roman World, and 2017 saw the publication of ground-breaking volumes on archaeological approaches to care (Powell, Southwell-Wright, and Gowland 2017;Tilley and Schrenk 2017). Nevertheless, the research area is still nascent, especially when compared with the intersecting discourse brought together within the Medical Humanities, including the History of Medicine and Medical Anthropology. Both of these fields are large, well-defined and well-funded, with their own research degrees and academic journals (notably Journal of Medical Humanities, Medical History, Medical Anthropology, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences). This volume sets out to make the case that there is potential for archaeology to develop its own subfield along similar lines, as our discipline has the ability to improve diachronic understanding of medicine and healthcare and to contribute to a range of emergent fields such as community and public health (Deprez and Thomas 2016), environmental and planetary health (