1999
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199907000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensuring compliance with NRMP policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although the medical matches attempt to prevent employers from asking for early commitments, or requesting information on how applicants will rank them in the match, medical matches are plagued with instances of requests for commitment and informal rankings. For example, Pearson and Innes (1999) reported that 15% of 1996 and 1997 graduates of the University of Virginia School of Medicine were asked for signals concerning what rank order list they intended to submit to the centralized match. Other surveys confirm this finding, and also that many medical students when confronted with such questions, answer deceptively (Anderson et al, 1999;Carek et al, 2000;Teichman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, although the medical matches attempt to prevent employers from asking for early commitments, or requesting information on how applicants will rank them in the match, medical matches are plagued with instances of requests for commitment and informal rankings. For example, Pearson and Innes (1999) reported that 15% of 1996 and 1997 graduates of the University of Virginia School of Medicine were asked for signals concerning what rank order list they intended to submit to the centralized match. Other surveys confirm this finding, and also that many medical students when confronted with such questions, answer deceptively (Anderson et al, 1999;Carek et al, 2000;Teichman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of medical students reveal that when they are nevertheless asked for such indications and commitments, they feel free to answer encouragingly, without constraining their subsequent behavior in the match (see e.g. Anderson et al, 1999;Carek et al, 2000;Pearson and Innes, 1999;Teichman et al, 2000). In the medical resident market, like the graduate admissions market, the rules of the market and the corresponding market culture result in current operations of those markets in which early matches seem not to be very common.…”
Section: Graduate and Undergraduate Admissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous publications suggest that violations of professional behavior in the match process may be common 3–11. However, the frequency of misleading communications is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%