2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensuring social acceptability of technological tracking in the COVID-19 context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, several authors including [ 9 , [73] , [74] , [75] , [76] , [77] , [78] ] raise tremendous ethical concerns by developing theoretical frameworks guiding the ethical use of COVID-19 social distancing monitoring tools and contact tracing apps. Table 2 shows published theoretical frameworks guiding the ethical use of social distancing tools amid the pandemic.…”
Section: Framework For Ethical and Socially Acceptable Use Of Artificial Intelligence Devices Iomt And Social Distancing Tools During Covmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, several authors including [ 9 , [73] , [74] , [75] , [76] , [77] , [78] ] raise tremendous ethical concerns by developing theoretical frameworks guiding the ethical use of COVID-19 social distancing monitoring tools and contact tracing apps. Table 2 shows published theoretical frameworks guiding the ethical use of social distancing tools amid the pandemic.…”
Section: Framework For Ethical and Socially Acceptable Use Of Artificial Intelligence Devices Iomt And Social Distancing Tools During Covmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The framework is generalized and the list of ethical values considered is not exhaustive even though some trade-offs need to be done based on the laws, values, attitudes and norms in context-specific. [77] Transparency, security, privacy, socio-cultural determinants and reversibility. The study focused on factors influencing ethical and social acceptability of technological tracking implementation, not necessarily a framework for ethical and acceptable use of digital tools amid COVID-19.…”
Section: Framework For Ethical and Socially Acceptable Use Of Artificial Intelligence Devices Iomt And Social Distancing Tools During Covmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is well known that online time alone is not a sufficient criterion to diagnose an IUD, it should be mentioned that different patterns of online use relatively robustly provide insights into negative affect accompanying addictive behavior: Withdrawal from society can be tracked via global position signal data [60] or less social interaction with others via phones and negative emotionality can be inferred from text mining messages [61]. The potential has been also described both to infer mental states in times of crisis such as COVID-19 to guide policy makers [62,63] and study the development of technological habits during the pandemic.…”
Section: The Potential Of Psychoinformatics For the Area Of Aftercare In Internet Use Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of COVID-19 tracking applications will not only depend on the accuracy of proximity estimation and how advanced the utilized technologies are, but also on the social acceptability of the applications (Georgieva et al, 2020). Aware of the fact that utilization rates of digital contact tracing applications will largely depend on people's sentiments regarding these applications, a number of country-level studies have been conducted in various countries including India (Garg et al, 2020), Republic of Ireland (O'Callaghan et al, 2020), Poland (Wnuk et al, 2020), Belgium (Walrave et al, 2020), Australia and Singapore (Wollongong and Michael, 2020;Goggin, 2020).…”
Section: Covid-19 Takip Uygulamaları: İnsan Odaklı Bir Analizmentioning
confidence: 99%