2019
DOI: 10.1080/10894160.2019.1666447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entangling past, present, and future to examine queerness and white privilege in academia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, McIntosh's (1998) pioneering text on white privilege was demonstrably autoethnographical and other examples have occasionally appeared in which white academics reflect on the white privilege that they have within Western educational contexts (e.g. Hobson et al, 2018;Shelton 2019). Until now, there has been an absence of autoethnographies about whiteness in East Asian higher education, with the exception of the provocative contribution made by Rivers (2019), whose approach is markedly different from this article given his insistence that white academics, particularly white male academics, are largely disadvantaged by their whiteness.…”
Section: Autoethnography As a Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, McIntosh's (1998) pioneering text on white privilege was demonstrably autoethnographical and other examples have occasionally appeared in which white academics reflect on the white privilege that they have within Western educational contexts (e.g. Hobson et al, 2018;Shelton 2019). Until now, there has been an absence of autoethnographies about whiteness in East Asian higher education, with the exception of the provocative contribution made by Rivers (2019), whose approach is markedly different from this article given his insistence that white academics, particularly white male academics, are largely disadvantaged by their whiteness.…”
Section: Autoethnography As a Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%