2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entecavir: A new treatment option for chronic hepatitis B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Entecavir was evaluated in phase II trials (Lai et al, 2002;Wolters et al, 2002) and in 3 controlled phase III trials involving 1633 patients with chronic HBV infection, detectable HBV DNA, persistently elevated ALT levels and chronic inflammation on liver biopsy. In 2 randomized studies involving nucleoside naive patients (HBeAg positive or negative), entecavir administered 0.5 mg orally once daily for 52 weeks was superior to lamivudine (100 mg orally once daily for 52 weeks) on the primary efficacy endpoint of histological improvement and on secondary endpoints, such as the reduction in viral load and normalization of ALT Lai et al, 2006;Zoulim, 2006). After two years of treatment, 81% of patients receiving entecavir had a viral load below 300 copies / mL versus only 39% of patients receiving lamivudine, 31% seronconverted to anti-HBe versus 26% in the lamivudine group, and 5% showed a clearance of HBsAg versus 3% in lamivudine treated patients (Gish et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Results Of Adefovir Dipivoxil Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entecavir was evaluated in phase II trials (Lai et al, 2002;Wolters et al, 2002) and in 3 controlled phase III trials involving 1633 patients with chronic HBV infection, detectable HBV DNA, persistently elevated ALT levels and chronic inflammation on liver biopsy. In 2 randomized studies involving nucleoside naive patients (HBeAg positive or negative), entecavir administered 0.5 mg orally once daily for 52 weeks was superior to lamivudine (100 mg orally once daily for 52 weeks) on the primary efficacy endpoint of histological improvement and on secondary endpoints, such as the reduction in viral load and normalization of ALT Lai et al, 2006;Zoulim, 2006). After two years of treatment, 81% of patients receiving entecavir had a viral load below 300 copies / mL versus only 39% of patients receiving lamivudine, 31% seronconverted to anti-HBe versus 26% in the lamivudine group, and 5% showed a clearance of HBsAg versus 3% in lamivudine treated patients (Gish et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Results Of Adefovir Dipivoxil Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could explain the apparent, though probably less than complete [29] , disappearance of cccDNA during spontaneous clearance of HBV infection. However, therapeutic cccDNA elimination from the chronically infected liver remains a major issue even with the latest generation antivirals [30,31] ; further investigations into the mechanism of cccDNA formation, and possibly breakdown, are clearly warranted.…”
Section: Hepatitis B Virus Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is safe and has a very low resistance rate among treatment-naïve patients as compared to relatively high rate in lamivudine-resistant patients and so warrant consideration for first-line therapy. However, it is much more costly, and the cost-effective analysis need to be systematically assessed [110,111]. After initial data on the lack of activity against HIV, it is recently reported that it affects HIV-1 replication and resistance [112].…”
Section: Entecavir Therapy In Other Patient Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%