2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methane yield is only one relevant measure, and other major CH 4 emission and animal performance metrics must be considered to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of mitigation strategies. Only one recent publication examined the quantitative effects of multiple mitigation strategies on CH 4 emission and animal performance metrics, but the analysis was limited to Latin America ( 21 ). Important CH 4 emission metrics include daily CH 4 emissions, CH 4 Y, or CH 4 -energy conversion factor [Y m ; CH 4 energy as a proportion of gross energy intake; a component of the tier 2 calculation for national GHG inventories recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( 22 )], CH 4 I G , and CH 4 I M .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methane yield is only one relevant measure, and other major CH 4 emission and animal performance metrics must be considered to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of mitigation strategies. Only one recent publication examined the quantitative effects of multiple mitigation strategies on CH 4 emission and animal performance metrics, but the analysis was limited to Latin America ( 21 ). Important CH 4 emission metrics include daily CH 4 emissions, CH 4 Y, or CH 4 -energy conversion factor [Y m ; CH 4 energy as a proportion of gross energy intake; a component of the tier 2 calculation for national GHG inventories recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( 22 )], CH 4 I G , and CH 4 I M .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from our experiments confirm that the supplementation of animals grazing on low-quality forage can increase DM intake, the efficiency of nutrients utilization and ADG. The use of these supplementation strategies can reduce slaughter age and consequently methane emissions in comparison to non-supplemented animals [ 41 , 43 , 44 ]. As indicated by Cappai et al [ 45 ], circulating parameters of clinical importance may indicate homeostasis perturbations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Arndt et al (2021) (Niu et al, 2018;van Lingen et al, 2019) and evaluation of mitigation practices for Latin American and Caribbean (Congio et al, 2021(Congio et al, , 2022 and Southeast Asia (Tee et al, 2022) regions.…”
Section: A Review Of the Arndt Et Al (2021) Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%