1960
DOI: 10.1084/jem.112.5.821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteroviral Ribonucleic Acid

Abstract: Recognition of the infectivity of ribonucleic acid (RNA) of tobacco mosaic (1, 2) and of animal virus (3) initiated investigation of the molecular aspects of viral reproduction. Study of replication of infectious RNA depends upon employment of efficient and reproducible biological assay procedures. Reception of viral genetic material normally depends upon specific interaction of cellular and viral receptors (4--6) while phenol extracted virus has lost this specificity (7). Therefore, assay of infectious RNA ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outside a 16-fold dilution range and plaque counts 160-10, plaque formation was no longer a linear function of the RNA dilution and at very low dilutions inhibition may occur. This may be due to the aggregation of the RNA in the presence of ZM-M~SO,, as suggested by Holland et al (1960), or to inhibition by cellular DNA and RNA present in the extract (Franklin, Wecker & Henry, 1959;Holland et al 1960). The first possibility is contra-indicated in our system by the fact that RNA diluted in ZM-M~SO, could be held for up to ' 1 hr a t 0' without apparent loss in titre.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Outside a 16-fold dilution range and plaque counts 160-10, plaque formation was no longer a linear function of the RNA dilution and at very low dilutions inhibition may occur. This may be due to the aggregation of the RNA in the presence of ZM-M~SO,, as suggested by Holland et al (1960), or to inhibition by cellular DNA and RNA present in the extract (Franklin, Wecker & Henry, 1959;Holland et al 1960). The first possibility is contra-indicated in our system by the fact that RNA diluted in ZM-M~SO, could be held for up to ' 1 hr a t 0' without apparent loss in titre.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As with pig kidney cells, very few plaques were obtained when the RNA was added in isotonic solution. When the cell sheets were washed with hypertonic solutions before the addition of the RNA (Koch, Koenig & Alexander, 1960) or the RNA was diluted in hypertonic solution (Alexander, Koch, Holland, Hoyer, McLaren & Syverton, 1960), more plaques were formed. These observations led us to make a more detailed study of the optimal conditions for plaque formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a t 18" in different buffers and tested for infectivity by the plaque method. Dilution and adsorption in ~M -M~S O , according to Holland, Hoyer, McLaren & Syverton (1960) gave 20-fold higher titres than other methods tested ( Table 1). The nucleic acid infectivity was completely inactivated by treatment with ribonuclease which did not affect the titre of intact virus.…”
Section: Persistently Infected Culturesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The efficacy of transfection could be predicted from the quality of the precipitate. After 90 min (NHBE), 2 h (CV-1), or 3 h (NIH 3T3), the cells were rinsed twice with serum-free medium at 37°C, incubated with 1.5 ml of 15% glycerol for 30 s at room temperature (NHBE), 3 min at 37°C (CV-1), or 1.5 min at room temperature (NIH 3T3), rinsed three times with serum-free medium, and refed (11,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%