Enterprise 2.0: Research Challenges and Opportunities

Maamar, Zakaria; Faci, Noura; Kajan, Ejub; Boukadi, Khouloud; Sakr, Sherif; Boukhebouze, Mohamed; Mostéfaoui, Soraya Kouadri; Burégio, Vanilson Arruda; Yahya, Fadwa; Monfort, Valérie; Hennion, Romain

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27030-2_2

“…This is why, according to [23], considering the employees' mindset is a key factor of a successful implementation, especially in the case of small and mediumsized enterprises. In terms of practice, [31] suggests integrating the social dimension into the development and maintenance of the organizational information system. It creates social networks represented by relations between the process's components.…”

Section: Stage 4: Service Operationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enterprise 2.0 – Literature Taxonomy and Usage Evaluation

Alimam

¹

,

Bertin

²

,

Crespi

³

2016

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the ten years since the emergence of the Enterprise 2.0 phenomenon, many studies have been realized in this field. This paper surveys today's Enterprise 2.0 literature. Based on the ITIL methodology, it outlines its main research areas and highlights the remaining issues. Also, starting from the lack of empirical evaluation of the real usage of Enterprise 2.0 tools, it proposes to evaluate the use of a social networking platform in a large company based on the relationships created therein. Our findings indicate that social networking tools are not reflecting the employees' actual relations at work.

show abstract

“…Scholars alluded to the new movement on HE for social responsibility that contributes to economic and social development. Maamar et al (2015) argue that monitoring of university business should go beyond tracking progress and provide an end-to-end view of progress in terms of how goals have been achieved by the organisation. The quest for good governance in HE also sparked debates to check whether the set objectives are achieved on an annual basis to enhance governance and accountability of university operations and academic programmes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fourth Industrial Revolution as a driver for the public good through higher education institutions

Jere¹,

Aruleba²,

Jere³

2022

Higher Education for Public Good: Perspectives in the New Academic Landscape in South Africa

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer-review declarationThe publisher (AOSIS) endorses the South African 'National Scholarly Book Publishers Forum Best Practice for Peer-Review of Scholarly Books'. The manuscript underwent an evaluation to compare the level of originality with other published works and was subjected to rigorous two-step peer-review before publication, with the identities of the reviewers not revealed to the editor(s) or author(s). The reviewers were independent of the publisher, editor(s) and author(s). The publisher shared feedback on the similarity report and the reviewers' inputs with the manuscript's editor(s) or author(s) to improve the manuscript. Where the reviewers recommended revision and improvements the editor(s) or author(s) responded adequately to such recommendations. The reviewers commented positively on the scholarly merits of the manuscript and recommended that the book be published.

show abstract

“…Scholars alluded to the new movement on HE for social responsibility that contributes to economic and social development. Maamar et al (2015) argue that monitoring of university business should go beyond tracking progress and provide an end-to-end view of progress in terms of how goals have been achieved by the organisation. The quest for good governance in HE also sparked debates to check whether the set objectives are achieved on an annual basis to enhance governance and accountability of university operations and academic programmes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconsidering the power of decolonisation among selected southern African university students

Jere¹,

Jere²,

Hlatywayo³

2022

Higher Education for Public Good: Perspectives in the New Academic Landscape in South Africa

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer-review declarationThe publisher (AOSIS) endorses the South African 'National Scholarly Book Publishers Forum Best Practice for Peer-Review of Scholarly Books'. The manuscript underwent an evaluation to compare the level of originality with other published works and was subjected to rigorous two-step peer-review before publication, with the identities of the reviewers not revealed to the editor(s) or author(s). The reviewers were independent of the publisher, editor(s) and author(s). The publisher shared feedback on the similarity report and the reviewers' inputs with the manuscript's editor(s) or author(s) to improve the manuscript. Where the reviewers recommended revision and improvements the editor(s) or author(s) responded adequately to such recommendations. The reviewers commented positively on the scholarly merits of the manuscript and recommended that the book be published.

show abstract

Enterprise 2.0: Research Challenges and Opportunities

Cited by 9 publications

References 11 publications

Enterprise 2.0 – Literature Taxonomy and Usage Evaluation

Enterprise 2.0 – Literature Taxonomy and Usage Evaluation

Fourth Industrial Revolution as a driver for the public good through higher education institutions

Reconsidering the power of decolonisation among selected southern African university students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About