2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-017-9930-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrainment and boundary-layer separation: a modeling history

Abstract: For many decades since Prandtl's presentation of the boundary-layer equations, all attempts to calculate separated boundary layers ended up in a break-down of the numerical algorithm. It was not until the late 1970s that the first successful calculations were reported. The paper describes the history and philosophy of the steps that led to understanding where the break-down originates and how to circumvent it. Especially, the role of Head's entrainment will be highlighted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At locations where the flow in the boundary layer separates from the airfoil surface, the operator M 2 becomes singular [95,98,101]. As a result, one or more eigenvalues of the iteration operator M −1 2 M 1 , and hence the (equivalence of the) added-mass ratio, move towards infinity: the 'added-mass ratio' may even change sign.…”
Section: The Quasi-simultaneous Coupling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At locations where the flow in the boundary layer separates from the airfoil surface, the operator M 2 becomes singular [95,98,101]. As a result, one or more eigenvalues of the iteration operator M −1 2 M 1 , and hence the (equivalence of the) added-mass ratio, move towards infinity: the 'added-mass ratio' may even change sign.…”
Section: The Quasi-simultaneous Coupling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%