Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters

Abstract

Defining entrepreneurship as the creation of new organisations,this paper explores,from a literature review standpoint,the moderating effect of clusters on the impact of entrepreneurship on development. To identify potential causes of this moderating effect, the paper focuses on three different impacts: entrepreneurship on development, clusters on development,and clusters on entrepreneurship. The findings of the paper are threefold.First,entrepreneurship is positively associated with economic growth.Given the importance of entrepreneurship in changing the economic and social structure of the economy,more research on the impact of entrepreneurship on development - i.e. focus on capabilities rather than on output - is needed. Second,it is difficult to reach empirical generalisations on the impact of clusters on development and entrepreneurship given conceptual and methodological constraints. Both positive results and caveats are found at different levels of analysis and at different stages of development of a cluster. Finally, given the previous finding, it is difficult to generalise on the impact of clusters on the association between entrepreneurship and development. Consensus on and validity between conceptual and operational definitions of clusters; consideration of context as well as process and, therefore, quantitative and qualitative methods; and differentiation between levels of analysis controlling for cluster stage and strength are the main criteria for future studies to consider to disentangle the impact of clusters on entrepreneurship, development and the association between entrepreneurship and development. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Regional Dimensions of Entrepreneurship

“…Rocha, 2004 for a review), the contextual approach to entrepreneurship has long been discussed primarily from the perspective of the national economy. This volume offers theoretical arguments, empirical evidence and policy-based comments to support the hypothesis that entrepreneurial activities are to a large extent a "regional event" (Feldman, 2001).…”

The Deviated Mechanisms between Chintrepreneurship and Entrepreneurship– Collectivism or Individualism in Forming the Mechanism of China-way of Entrepreneurship

“…Empirical evidences confirmed that, despite in the developed economies, the linear roadmap of entrepreneurship, business competitiveness and economic capability dominates the mainstream of literature, however, such a positive linearity is not significant in developing economies (Hector & Rocha, 2004), and that the trajectory from entrepreneurship to industrial clusters and economic growth, is leveraged by regional technological capability of innovation, which serves as a platform to facilitate industrial transformation and corporate productivity (Feldman & Yoon, 2012). For example, by comparing the diverged path of entrepreneurship between Silicon Valley, CA and Route 128, MA, the two global hubs of technological innovation in the IT-industries, some scholars found that, the sharply contrasted outcome between the two locations since the 1960s, may be attributed to their respectively differentiated path of industrial cultures, inter-firm relations and organizational capability of innovation (Kenney & Burg, 1999).…”

La performance des réseaux : les cas de deux réseaux brésiliens

“…Les structures en réseau sont considérées par plusieurs auteurs comme de véritables instruments de politique éco-nomique en raison de leurs impacts positifs sur la performance des entreprises, la compétitivité et la croissance économique nationale (Rocha, 2004). En effet, on leur attribue plusieurs vertus telles que la flexibilité et la réactivité.…”

“…La coopération devient ainsi un élé-ment important de stratégie et d'organisation pour ces entreprises. Cette coopération implique une réorganisation plus souple des structures organisationnelles, plus précisément le développement des structures en réseau (Miles et Snow, 1986).Les structures en réseau sont considérées par plusieurs auteurs comme de véritables instruments de politique éco-nomique en raison de leurs impacts positifs sur la performance des entreprises, la compétitivité et la croissance économique nationale (Rocha, 2004). En effet, on leur attribue plusieurs vertus telles que la flexibilité et la réactivité.…”