Entrepreneurship as a dynamic field of study: a bibliometric analysis of research output

Ramírez, Luis Javier Cabeza; Cañizares, Sandra Sánchez; García, Fernando Fuentes

doi:10.18089/tms.2017.13307

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is a method widely used in the literature as it provides an overview of academic research, through the identification of the main trends in a given field of study (Martínez-López et al, 2018). Many bibliometric revisions regarding entrepreneurship have been conducted (Cabeza-Ramírez et al, 2017;Baier-Fuentes et al, 2019). However, specifically to the relationship between family role and entrepreneurship, our research did not generate any results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Entrepreneurship and Family Role: A Systematic Review of a Growing Research

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, research on the family role and entrepreneurship has increased noticeably, consolidating itself as a valid and current subject of study. This paper presents a systematic analysis of academic research, applying bibliometric indicators, and cluster analysis, which define the state of research about the relationship between family role and entrepreneurship. For this purpose, using three well-accepted databases among the research community: Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source, a total of 92 articles were selected and analyzed, published between 1989 and 2019 (until March). A cluster analysis shows five main areas of literature development: (1) cultural dimension and geneder issue; (2) family business and succession; (3) parental role models and entrepreneurial intentions; (4) entrepreneurship and self-employment; (5) family support and women entrepreneurs. Findings also show how this is a relatively recent field of study, with a multidisciplinary character.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Entrepreneurship and Family Role: A Systematic Review of a Growing Research

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, there are bibliometric analyzes conducted from an educational point of view without being associated with a different concept, discipline or sub-field in the relevant literature. At this point, on keyword analysis in entrepreneurship education from an educational point of view (Kakouris & Georgiadis, 2016), on entrepreneurship education researches in general (Aparicio, Iturralde & Maseda, 2019), on the importance of both entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship education in general (Amjada & Nasirb, 2020), on entrepreneurship in general (Ramírez, Cañizare & García, 2017), and on the past, present and future of Chinese entrepreneurship education research (Zheng, 2018) bibliometric analyzes were conducted.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of published documents on entrepreneurship in basic sciences (Physics, Chemistry, Biology)

Deveci¹

2024

tused

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, efforts to transform scientific information produced in basic sciences into technology to facilitate daily life have been increasing. In this sense, the perspective of entrepreneurship gains importance in basic sciences. This study aims analyze documents published on entrepreneurship in basic sciences (physics, chemistry, biology) using a bibliometric review. For this aim, the bibliometric analysis method based on the systematic literature review approach was used. Systematic review was carried out in the WoS database. A total of 428 documents on entrepreneurship in basic sciences in the WoS were retrieved. The bibliometric analysis results were presented under two main categories as descriptive (numbers of documents according to year, author, country, organization, source, research area, WoS category area) and evaluative results (cooccurrence, co-authorship, citation analysis). Descriptive results were displayed with frequency values, and evaluative results were displayed using VOSviewer visualization software. As a result, it was determined that there is an important increase in the number of documents towards 2020. In addition, it was determined that the most productive, influential, and collaborative author is Jardım-Goncalves R, the most productive country is the USA, the most productive journal is Journal of Technology Transfer, and the most productive organization is Old Dominion University. Moreover, it has been determined that the most influential area in terms of research area is "business economics" and the most keyword co-occurrences are "entrepreneurship", "design science" and "academic entrepreneurship".

show abstract

“…This led to the assumption that agile branding is not an established scientific term. WoS is acknowledged as a precise and reliable repository for scientific analysis (Cabeza Ramírez et al 2017;Donthu et al 2021;Martínez et al 2015). To define AB, a broader search strategy and a closer look at other branding-related areas were necessary (see Table A1).…”

Section: Phase 1-systematic Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualizing Agile Branding: Dimensions and Antecedents for Managing Brands in a Dynamic Environment

Pöhlmann,

Seitz,

Jambrino-Maldonado

et al. 2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional branding approaches take too long to react to today’s dynamic environment. Agile branding offers a promising approach and might be the contemporary answer to the demands of our digitalized world. While scientists state that an agile approach to branding is essential nowadays, there is a lack of knowledge on how agile branding can be conceptualized and applied in practice. This article aims to provide a better understanding of agile branding by identifying its dimensions and antecedents. This study pursued a multi-method approach: a systematic literature review was conducted, followed by qualitative semi-structured interviews with eleven experts and a group discussion with five participants. Applying the dynamic capabilities perspective, the authors identify five dimensions, including 20 antecedents of agile branding: (a) leadership style and culture, (b) employee skills and competencies, (c) technology and methods, (d) stakeholder and feedback integration, and (e) ambidexterity. The critical challenge of agile branding is to balance brand continuity and adaptation. The study is the first to conceptualize agile branding, offering scientists and practitioners values and principles on how brands can be managed and further evolved in a constantly changing world to stay relevant in the market and ahead of the competition.

show abstract

Entrepreneurship as a dynamic field of study: a bibliometric analysis of research output

Cited by 11 publications

References 36 publications

Entrepreneurship and Family Role: A Systematic Review of a Growing Research

Entrepreneurship and Family Role: A Systematic Review of a Growing Research

Bibliometric analysis of published documents on entrepreneurship in basic sciences (Physics, Chemistry, Biology)

Conceptualizing Agile Branding: Dimensions and Antecedents for Managing Brands in a Dynamic Environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About