2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrepreneurship education at Nordic technical higher education institutions: Comparing and contrasting program designs and content

Abstract: In higher education (HE), science and technology (STEM) institutions were early adopters of entrepreneurship education; recognizing that STEM majors in particular have a disproportional potential to form high-growth ventures in high-tech industries with high-value prospects. Yet, only limited empirical work has been carried out to shed light on how these programs are developed and how and why they are designed and organized the way that they are. What we do know typically comes to us from single-case reports o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The CSE programme was top-ranked by the Swedish government in 2009 using an international review board of entrepreneurship education professors, and the collaborating incubator was ranked number eight in the world and second in Europe in 2014 by UBI Index. Its status as an extreme case of experiential entrepreneurship education has attracted a number of external scholars studying many different aspects of the programme (Åstebro et al 2012;Berggren 2011;Johannisson 2016;Lindholm Dahlstrand and Berggren 2010;Rasmussen and Sørheim 2006;Warhuus and Basaiawmoit 2014).…”
Section: The Case Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSE programme was top-ranked by the Swedish government in 2009 using an international review board of entrepreneurship education professors, and the collaborating incubator was ranked number eight in the world and second in Europe in 2014 by UBI Index. Its status as an extreme case of experiential entrepreneurship education has attracted a number of external scholars studying many different aspects of the programme (Åstebro et al 2012;Berggren 2011;Johannisson 2016;Lindholm Dahlstrand and Berggren 2010;Rasmussen and Sørheim 2006;Warhuus and Basaiawmoit 2014).…”
Section: The Case Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the literature points out that entrepreneurship centers have a focal position in stimulating enterprise and entrepreneurship activities within HEIs [32,33]. Nevertheless, even though their important role has been largely acknowledged, there is a lack of investigation related to how entrepreneurship centers organize their education actions in order to develop highly skilled human capital with an entrepreneurial mindset for technology entrepreneurship [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, for technology and human capital to work more productively together, society needs people who have both technology and business skills. Universities and professional training institutions respond to this need by offering interdisciplinary training for entrepreneurs and engineers (Warhuusa & Basaiawmoit, 2014; Winkler, Schweikert, Troudt, & Schulman, 2015).…”
Section: Positive Impact Of Technology At Microlevelmentioning
confidence: 99%