2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2019.2963190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ENTROPiA: Towards Infinite Surface Haptic Displays in Virtual Reality Using Encountered-Type Rotating Props

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel approach towards an infinite surface haptic display. Our approach, named ENcountered-Type ROtating Prop Approach (ENTROPiA) is based on a cylindrical spinning prop attached to a robot's end-effector serving as an encountered-type haptic display (ETHD). This type of haptic display permits the users to have an unconstrained, free-hand contact with a surface being provided by a robotic device for the users' to encounter a surface to be touched. In our approach, the sensation of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only feedback related to vibration, contact, pressure, temperature, FIGURE 2 | Wearability in haptic devices: from grounded haptic interfaces to more wearable and portable designs. (A) ENTROPiA, a cylindrical spinning prop attached to a robot to provide haptic virtual texture (Mercado et al, 2019); (B) a hand exoskeleton for natural pitching (Lucas et al, 2004); (C) a cutaneous display providing normal and shear stimuli (Pacchierotti et al, 2016).…”
Section: Tactile Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only feedback related to vibration, contact, pressure, temperature, FIGURE 2 | Wearability in haptic devices: from grounded haptic interfaces to more wearable and portable designs. (A) ENTROPiA, a cylindrical spinning prop attached to a robot to provide haptic virtual texture (Mercado et al, 2019); (B) a hand exoskeleton for natural pitching (Lucas et al, 2004); (C) a cutaneous display providing normal and shear stimuli (Pacchierotti et al, 2016).…”
Section: Tactile Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the left are two representative examples of tactile stimulation interfaces: vibrotactile actuators [C2-tactors(Cincotti et al, 2007a)]; pressure and contact interfaces(Chinello et al, 2012). On the right are two representative examples of kinesthetic stimulation interfaces: Orthosis developed byRamos-Murguialday et al (2012); grounded force interface ENTROPiA(Mercado et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, common features such as rendering haptic texture and providing 6-DoF interaction is a challenge for an ETHD compared to a conventional kinesthetic haptic device. A possible solution for texture rendering is to use a wide end-effector with multiple portions of physical textures, similar to the work of [27]. Then a suitable portion can be encountered with the tool at different times.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transparent, flexible plate is manipulated in 4 degrees-of-freedom (DoF) by two 3-DoF parallel robots, based on the position of the user's finger. Articulated robot arms are used as ETHDs in [25][26][27] for interactions with wide flat virtual surfaces such as walls and desktops. The first two studies use flat, static props, whereas the third demonstrates a multi-textured spinning prop for a richer rendering with sliding and friction sensations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explore a surface larger than the end-effector, the community has been looking forward to displace the contact area. An adequate integration between interaction strategy and end-effector's physical properties permits to recreate different surfaces that can go beyond what is physically represented on the device [4,8,13,24,27,33]. Previous works have relied on strategies such as visuo-haptic illusion, user redirection and active surface displacement.…”
Section: Moveable Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 99%