2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Above that, extensions and alteratives (beyond the scope of our analysis) can be found in the current literature: First, Assa et al (2016) put forward the idea of using a cumulative risk measure based on the Entropic Value at Risk (CEVaR). Application to portfolio optimization was provided by Brandtner et al (2018). Second, φ-EVaR as an extension is discussed by Pichler and Schlotter (2018) by replacing the relative entropy in the dual representation with different divergences as suggested in Ahmadi-Javid (2012c) first.…”
Section: Risk Measures Beyond Varmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above that, extensions and alteratives (beyond the scope of our analysis) can be found in the current literature: First, Assa et al (2016) put forward the idea of using a cumulative risk measure based on the Entropic Value at Risk (CEVaR). Application to portfolio optimization was provided by Brandtner et al (2018). Second, φ-EVaR as an extension is discussed by Pichler and Schlotter (2018) by replacing the relative entropy in the dual representation with different divergences as suggested in Ahmadi-Javid (2012c) first.…”
Section: Risk Measures Beyond Varmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are based on the concept of relative entropy, which is a measure of divergence between two probability distributions 1 . Two classes of entropic risk measures have been compared in Brandtner et al (2018), namely coherent or convex. These properties of risk measures are discussed largely in the literature and express some nice properties in terms of decision making strategies or solving complex portfolio optimization problems, see Cheridito et al (2005), Detlefsen and Scandolo (2005), Ben-Tal and Teboulle (2007), Ruszczynski and Shapiro (2004), Föllmer and Penner (2006), Seck et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extended forms and models can deal with different types of portfolio selection issues according to the different aims. Second, to optimize the existing portfolio selection methods, some improved models have been presented, such as the mean absolute deviation portfolio model (Simaan, 1997), the Bayesian framework portfolio model (P astor, 2000), the mean-VaR portfolio model (Alexander & Baptista, 2002), the chance constrained portfolio model (Abdelaziz et al, 2007), the constrained fuzzy analytic hierarchy portfolio model (Nguyen & Gordon-Brown, 2012), the risk-return portfolio model (Brandtner et al, 2018), and the mean-risk portfolio model (Mehralizade et al, 2020). Third, to deal with different real problems, some new models have been designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%