2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55258-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entscheidungstheorie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These consequences will lead to a result of the alternatives into the decision model. Important figures of the decision maker are defined as targets, these values are the result (Laux, Gillenkirch, & Schenk-Mathes, 2014).…”
Section: Digital Customer Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These consequences will lead to a result of the alternatives into the decision model. Important figures of the decision maker are defined as targets, these values are the result (Laux, Gillenkirch, & Schenk-Mathes, 2014).…”
Section: Digital Customer Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics are decision relevant environmental conditions. The illustration of Figure 1 "Structures of environmental conditions" (Laux et al, 2014) shows different environmental situations and a possibility of designing decision conditions. A decision structure under certainty means, that the decision maker has the real condition of the alternatives, hence all relevant information for the decision is given.…”
Section: Digital Customer Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Audit research has shown an increased interest in the effects of the individual´s risk preference on the audit quality (e.g. Johnstone 2000; Klersey and Roberts 2010;Pummerer et al 2013;Laux et al 2014) already for some time,. The auditor´s risk preference has a considerable impact on the audit process as auditors follow mostly a risk-based approach and make their decisions based on risk assessments (Dusenbury et al 2000;Johnstone 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a structured economic and integrated evaluation of innovative (and often complex) products, processes, production factors (such as materials) and combinations of these object types, a procedure model has proven to be worthwhile [8][9][10][11]. This model is characterized by a hierarchical breakdown of the evaluation task as well as a decision theory-based sequence of six steps at each level:…”
Section: Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%