2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-970405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entwicklung eines rehabilitationsspezifischen Komorbiditätsscores und erste Prüfung methodischer Gütekriterien

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the self-reported severity of diseases is often used as a basis to calculate weights [12,40]. By contrast, we empirically derived weights from the impact of diseases on self-reported health status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the self-reported severity of diseases is often used as a basis to calculate weights [12,40]. By contrast, we empirically derived weights from the impact of diseases on self-reported health status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome was operationalized using the German versions of the SF-36 (Bullinger and Kirchberger, 1998; Ware and Sherbourne, 1992) and of the CES scale (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, Radloff, 1977; German Version ADS; Hautzinger and Bailer, 1993). Furthermore, physicians completed a questionnaire that included questions about disease-related variables such as somatic comorbidity (Glattacker et al, 2007). Modeled after instruments such as the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (Linn et al, 1968), this score assesses the existence of 14 somatic diseases (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is not necessarily a single value for reliability or validity of a given instrument across all applications and patient samples. Incremental changes in the measure may be infl uenced by disease severity and the treatment context [65] . Establishing the measurement properties of an instrument within any patient group is an ongoing process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%