Entwicklung und Evaluation einer Emotionsregulations-App

Böhme, Stephanie; Berking, Matthias

doi:10.1007/s11553-021-00866-5

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, future research could examine whether participants would benefit from a more flexible, blended approach, including extended opportunities to review session content and to train regularly while underway, for example, with the support of an application on their mobile phone (cf. Böhme & Berking, 2021). Research also indicates the relevance of shared decision making and active choices for intervention formats with respect to clinical outcomes (Lindhiem et al, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic emotion regulation training in an at‐risk sample: a randomized‐controlled trial of group‐based training versus self‐help bibliotherapy

Wittkamp

Krkovic

Lincoln

2023

British J Clinic Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Subclinical psychotic, depression, and anxiety symptoms form a transdiagnostic ‘at‐risk state’ for the development of mental disorders. Emotion regulation has been identified as a transdiagnostic factor relevant to the formation of these symptoms that can be successfully addressed in clinical interventions. Here, we tested whether a group‐based emotion regulation training would be effective in reducing distress and at preventing the transition to mental disorders in an at‐risk sample. Methods Participants with distressing subclinical psychotic, depression, or anxiety symptoms (n = 138) were randomly allocated to either the 8‐week group‐based affect regulation training (ART; Springer, New York) or an 8‐week self‐help bibliotherapy (BT). They underwent biweekly measurements during the intervention, as well as at a six‐ and 12‐month follow‐up. In an exploratory analysis, we tested whether the ART would be superior to BT in preventing the transition to any mental disorder at 12‐month follow‐up. We also tested for differences in trajectories of psychopathology and emotion regulation (via questionnaires) and emotion regulation in daily life (via the experience‐sampling method). Results Participants in the ART condition showed a greater improvement of emotion regulation in daily life than those with BT, but the ART was not superior over BT in preventing the transition to mental disorders. There were significant longitudinal reductions from pre‐ to post‐intervention for general psychopathology and symptoms but no superiority of the ART over BT. Conclusions Despite its efficacy in improving emotion regulation skills, the ART does not produce effects on psychopathology that justify its recommendation over self‐help approaches.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic emotion regulation training in an at‐risk sample: a randomized‐controlled trial of group‐based training versus self‐help bibliotherapy

Wittkamp

Krkovic

Lincoln

2023

British J Clinic Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Böhme and Berking describe the application of an emotion regulation APP based on Affect Regulation Training (ART). 41 By using the extended process model of emotion regulation as a theoretical framework to structure an emotion regulation intervention, 42 Bielinski and colleagues developed REMOTION. 43 The internet-based program aims to reduce the symptom severity of patients with a range of different diagnoses while improving their emotion.…”

Section: Emotion Regulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Two Web-Based Interventions (Res-Up! and REMOTION) in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy (Therapy Online Plus—TOP): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Trimpop¹,

Berger²,

Willutzki³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Only 11-40% of those affected by a mental disorder in Germany receive treatment. New approaches to improve the German health care system are needed in order to counter chronification. Online-interventions have been shown to be effective as stand-alone as well as add-ons to routine practice. Interventions designed for a wide range of mental disorders such as transdiagnostic interventions are needed to make treatment for mental disorders more accessible and thus shorten waiting times. In general, interventions can be differentiated as having either a capitalization focus - thus drawing on already existing strengths (CAP) - or a compensation focus - trying to compensate for deficits (COMP). Up to now, the effectiveness of transdiagnostic online-interventions with either a CAP- or a COMP-focus has not yet been evaluated. OBJECTIVE This study is the first to examine the effectiveness of two online-interventions focusing on (1) the activation of resilience and drawing on existing strengths (CAP: Res-Up!) and (2) the improvement of emotion regulation (COMP: REMOTION), compared to care as usual in routine outpatient psychotherapy. METHODS Adults with at least one mental health disorder will be recruited at four outpatient centers in Germany. Assessments will be made at baseline (T0), at 6-weeks-posttreatment (T1) and at 12-weeks follow-up (T2). Primary outcome will be symptom severity (BSI-18). Secondary outcomes will focus on emotion regulation and resilience. RESULTS Participant recruitment and data collection started in April 2020 and are ongoing as of July 2022. Results of the study are expected in 2023. CONCLUSIONS This randomized controlled trial will compare care as usual with the transdiagnostic internet-interventions Res-Up! and REMOTION and will thus inform future studies concerning the effectiveness of transdiagnostic online interventions in routine outpatient psychotherapy. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04352010, International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

show abstract

“…More recently, several mental health interventions that address or target emotion regulation have been developed as web- or mobile-based programs. For example, Böhme and Berking [ 41 ] describe the application of an emotion regulation app based on Affect Regulation Training.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Two Web-Based Interventions (Res-Up! and REMOTION) in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy (Therapy Online Plus—TOP): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Trimpop¹,

Berger²,

Willutzki³

2023

JMIR Res Protoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Only 11%-40% of those with a mental disorder in Germany receive treatment. In many cases, face-to-face psychotherapy is not available because of limited resources, such as an insufficient number of therapists in the area. New approaches to improve the German health care system are needed to counter chronification. Web-based interventions have been shown to be effective as stand-alone and add-on treatments to routine practice. Interventions designed for a wide range of mental disorders such as transdiagnostic interventions are needed to make treatment for mental disorders more accessible and thus shorten waiting times and mitigate the chronification of mental health problems. In general, interventions can be differentiated as having either a capitalization (CAP) focus—thus drawing on already existing strengths—or a compensation (COMP) focus—trying to compensate for deficits. Up to now, the effectiveness of transdiagnostic web-based interventions with either a CAP or a COMP focus has not yet been evaluated. Objective This study is the first to examine the effectiveness of two transdiagnostic web-based interventions: (1) the activation of resilience and drawing on existing strengths (CAP: Res-Up!) and (2) the improvement of emotion regulation (COMP: REMOTION), compared with care as usual (CAU) in routine outpatient psychotherapy. Methods Adults with at least 1 mental health disorder will be recruited at 4 outpatient centers in Germany. Participants will then be randomized equally into 1 of the 2 intervention groups Res-Up! (CAP) and REMOTION (COMP) or into the control group (CAU). Assessments will be made at baseline (T0), at 6 weeks after treatment start (T1), and at 12 weeks after treatment start (T2). A primary outcome will be symptom severity (Brief Symptom Inventory-18). Secondary outcomes will focus on emotion regulation and resilience. Results Participant recruitment and data collection started in April 2020 and were ongoing as of July 2022. We expect participants to benefit more from the interventions than from the CAU control on the dimensions of symptom severity, resilience, and emotion regulation. Furthermore, we expect to find possible differences between CAP and COMP. The results of the study are expected in 2023. Conclusions This randomized controlled trial will compare CAU with the transdiagnostic web-based interventions Res-Up! and REMOTION, and will thus inform future studies concerning the effectiveness of transdiagnostic web-based interventions in routine outpatient psychotherapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04352010; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04352010 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/41413

show abstract

Entwicklung und Evaluation einer Emotionsregulations-App

Cited by 4 publications

References 24 publications

Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic emotion regulation training in an at‐risk sample: a randomized‐controlled trial of group‐based training versus self‐help bibliotherapy

Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic emotion regulation training in an at‐risk sample: a randomized‐controlled trial of group‐based training versus self‐help bibliotherapy

Evaluation of Two Web-Based Interventions (Res-Up! and REMOTION) in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy (Therapy Online Plus—TOP): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Evaluation of Two Web-Based Interventions (Res-Up! and REMOTION) in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy (Therapy Online Plus—TOP): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About