1997
DOI: 10.1097/00002341-199703000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enucleation Volume Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency might be caused by individual differences. The values measured in our subjects were different from those of subjects in previous studies [26][27][28] , which might be a result of different refractive errors and examination methods.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This inconsistency might be caused by individual differences. The values measured in our subjects were different from those of subjects in previous studies [26][27][28] , which might be a result of different refractive errors and examination methods.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It is also noteworthy that the methods used by Bite et al (1985) and Thaller (1997) to determine eyeball volume were different from that used in the present study. Bite et al (1985) used computed tomography (CT) images while Thaller (1997) used a water displacement method to find the eyeball volume. The difference in eyeball volume found may be attributable to the differences in methodology used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…S urgical techniques for enucleation of the globe have been influenced by classic concepts of orbital anatomy. 1,2 Volume replacement and restoration of movement and comfort have been considered important aspects of a successful surgical outcome. [1][2][3][4] Volume deficiency and soft tissue displacement can contribute to complications such as enophthalmos and superior sulcus defect that compromise final results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%