Aerobic Plate Count (APC) and spiral plate (Spiral) methods using both manual counting (MC) and laser counting (LC) procedures were compared for pure bacterial, yeast, and mold cultures and raw milk samples. All four combinations of methods (APC-MC, APC-LC, Spiral-MC, and Spiral-LC) gave similar log,, counts of studied pure microbial cultures, producing results that were not different for the purposes of practical microbiology. With bacterial and yeast cultures, counts differed by less than half a logarithmic cycle (the range of di3erence = -0.26 to + 0.42). the range of difference being -0.03 to + 0.62 for Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium camemberti molds. An exception was noticed with Rhizopus oligosporus mold when plates were read by laser due to large (10-15 mm) colony size. The difference between the readings made manually and by laser colony scanner was about one logarithmic cycle with both APC and Spiral methods.Statistical analyses of the manually read results of bacterial and Saccharomyces cerevisiae spiral plates showed no differences at the 0.05 level of significance between the readings made by four or jive persons.For raw milk samples, Spiral-MC and Spiral-LC methods gave higher microbial numbers than APC-MC (63% of samples) and APC-LC (54% of samples) at 0.05 level of significance (p