2018
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment and past land use together predict functional diversity in a temperate forest

Abstract: Environment and human land use both shape forest composition. Abiotic conditions sift tree species from a regional pool via functional traits that influence species' suitability to the local environment. In addition, human land use can modify species distributions and change functional diversity of forests. However, it is unclear how environment and land use simultaneously shape functional diversity of tree communities. Land-use legacies are especially prominent in temperate forest landscapes that have been ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(162 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trait-environment interactions: As expected, the four traits differed in their interaction with environmental variables to predict species distributions across the landscape (Krishnadas et al, 2018b), and traitenvironment interactions differed between fragments and contiguous forest (Table 1). Interestingly, models with elevation alone explained similar extents of variation in trait-mediated abundances as models with multiple environmental predictors (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Trait-environment interactions: As expected, the four traits differed in their interaction with environmental variables to predict species distributions across the landscape (Krishnadas et al, 2018b), and traitenvironment interactions differed between fragments and contiguous forest (Table 1). Interestingly, models with elevation alone explained similar extents of variation in trait-mediated abundances as models with multiple environmental predictors (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Fragments experience edge effects that alter the microclimate (De Frenne et al, 2019Zellweger et al, 2020) and forest-climate feedbacks that can enhance local climatic stress (Arroyo-Rodríguez et al, 2017;Laurance, 2004). Both processes can decouple the how different traits mediate community composition across macro-scale environmental gradients in fragments compared to contiguous forest (Fernandes Neto et al, 2019;Krishnadas et al, 2018b;Lebrija-Trejos et al, 2010;Poorter et al, 2019;Zirbel and Brudvig, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing the coverage and quality of community-wide datasets will strengthen analyses of trait-climate relationships by including other types of traits (e.g., physiological and phenological traits), a wider range of environmental factors (e.g., soil condition/nutrient composition, microclimate, disturbance), greater geographic coverage, and larger plots with more trait samples. In addition to the climatic conditions examined in this study, functional diversity could also be influenced by the history of local land use, management, or other forms of disturbance (39). Therefore, including information about site history may help increase the accuracy of trait-climate analyses.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CATS regression analysis has been largely applied in plant communities (e.g. Baastrup-Spohr, Sand-Jensen, Nicolajsen, & Bruun, 2015;Janssen, Fuhr, Cateau, Nusillard, & Bouget, 2017;Krishnadas et al, 2018;Laughlin, Fulé, Huffman, Crouse, & Laliberté, 2011;Sonnier, Shipley, & Navas, 2010) and recently has been used in faunal communities (Bargmann et al, 2016;Harabiš & Dolný, 2018). Additionally, it has been used to assess the associated management strategies (Harabiš & Dolný, 2018) and to evaluate the impacts of disturbance on community assembly (Bargmann et al, 2016;Mouillot et al, 2013;Niu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%