2022
DOI: 10.1163/14219980-20210701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and biological drivers of prevalence and number of eggs and oocysts of intestinal parasites in red howler monkeys from Central Amazonia

Abstract: Host-parasite relationships can be directly affected by host’s biological aspects and environmental factors, which influence both the survival of infective forms and the incidence of parasites. However, logistical difficulties in accessing biological samples for parasitological studies makes the Amazon Forest into a poorly known region in relation to the dynamic of parasites of wild animals. Here, using 34 red howler monkeys’ biological samples donated by local subsistence hunters from two Amazon habitat types… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of biological samples donated by subsistence hunters has provided relevant ecological (e.g., Mayor et al, 2015), reproductive (e.g., Andrade et al, 2018;El Bizri et al, 2018;Mayor et al, 2017), feeding (e.g., Jesus, Castilla Torres, et al, 2022;Torres et al, 2022) and parasitic (e.g., Conga et al, 2019;Gomez-Puerta et al, 2020;Jesus, Oliveira-Ramalho, et al, 2022) data affecting wildlife populations in these areas. These results have been transmitted to the participating communities in meetings and via educational materials.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of biological samples donated by subsistence hunters has provided relevant ecological (e.g., Mayor et al, 2015), reproductive (e.g., Andrade et al, 2018;El Bizri et al, 2018;Mayor et al, 2017), feeding (e.g., Jesus, Castilla Torres, et al, 2022;Torres et al, 2022) and parasitic (e.g., Conga et al, 2019;Gomez-Puerta et al, 2020;Jesus, Oliveira-Ramalho, et al, 2022) data affecting wildlife populations in these areas. These results have been transmitted to the participating communities in meetings and via educational materials.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the presence of wild animal hunting by humans in these environments impairs the habituation and continuous monitoring of animals in their natural habitats, both for direct observation of feeding behavior (Altmann, 1974;Dew, 2003) or for non-invasive fecal sample collection (Moreno-Black, 1978;Nielsen et al, 2017). In such scenarios, the use of participatory methods that rely on the collaboration of local people, such as the voluntary donation of biological material by subsistence hunters, has proven to be a valuable alternative for studying ecological aspects of wild animals (Mayor et al, 2017;Jesus et al, 2022a), including diet studies of arboreal primates that are difficult to observe and monitor (e.g., Jesus et al, 2022b;Torres et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%