Environmental conditions, subsidiaries’ autonomy and global innovation in multinational enterprises

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of environmental conditions of the subsidiaries’ host country in the process of developing global innovation. It is argued that, even though the local environment in which subsidiaries are placed must be taken into account, this is not the only important factor to directly create global innovation, but it also becomes necessary for the subsidiaries to be endowed with autonomy, in this sense allowing them to enjoy the local conditions for innovation purposes. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative approach is opted for the research development, while the hypotheses were evaluated from the analysis of the relationship between four constructs: global innovation, local market conditions, local competitive dynamics and autonomy to innovate. The structural equation modeling technique is applied, using data from 172 foreign subsidiaries located in Brazil. Findings The validity and reliability parameters analyzed in the proposed model were suitable (average variance extracted, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability and discriminant validity). H1 (the better the market conditions of the host country, the greater the subsidiary’s autonomy to innovate) was not supported. However, both H2 and H3 were supported, suggesting the influence of local competitive dynamics on autonomy to innovate, and also the influence of autonomy to innovate on global innovation, respectively. Originality/value This paper provides some contributions for the advance in researches about the global innovation management, considering the subsidiaries’ perspective, showing the relevance of the subsidiary’s autonomy for the development of global innovation given a favorable local competitive dynamic.

Innovation models and interdisciplinarity in science, technology and innovation policy in Costa Rica

“…In this case, location is paramount, as well as the array of natural, social and environmental factors that converge in it. Innovation is a situated (or configured) phenomenon linked to the relationships and resources that take place in a specific location (Furio, 1996; Hansen, 1992; Pereira et al , 2020). The weakness of evolutionary and innovative models is that only one dimension is considered as the central element of innovation and do not account for other factors that influence innovation (Marinova and Phillimore, 2003).…”

Benchmarking of Singapore maritime cluster: the role of cluster facilitators

“…This involve understanding of the innovation cluster through a case study approach focussing on the cluster framework, including the institutions and role of cluster actors. The local environmental conditions where the subsidiaries operate is an important factor for the MNEs subsidiaries to create innovation that will benefit the host country, as well as the MNEs global innovation capabilities (Pereira et al , 2020).…”

“…The authors consider that Singapore's success in this area should be of interest to other policy makers and industry practitioners, in addition to its potential contribution to academic literature. The initial review of the literature indicates a gap in identifying the cluster dynamics (Reve, 2011a, b; Reve and Sasson, 2015), particularly the interaction within the cluster actors and the role of the cluster facilitators (Zhang and Lam, 2013a, b; Pereira et al , 2020; Prakash and Ambekar, 2021; Akpinar and Ozer-Caylan, 2021; Lee et al , 2021). This identified gap has some complimented dimension to the policy initiatives and measures for the Singapore maritime cluster to be recognised as a leading maritime capital (Menon Economics, 2012, 2015, 2017) and shipping centre (Parzhytska and Pokrovsky, 2021).…”

Industrial Agglomeration and Enterprise Innovation Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from the Chinese A-Share Market

“…The second factor is adjustment costs. The costs associated with hiring, training, and the negative externalities resulting from proprietary innovation knowledge spillovers generated during the interruption and continuation of the R&D innovation process can lead to significant adjustment costs [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Against this backdrop, it is essential to maintain the sustainability of a company's R&D innovation through internal smoothing mechanisms.…”