2021
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental DNA for biomonitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings support the need for a proper DNA barcode reference library for all organisms. Such misidentifications may result in avoidable consequences, as more countries and stakeholders include metabarcoding as a standard biomonitoring protocol [ 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings support the need for a proper DNA barcode reference library for all organisms. Such misidentifications may result in avoidable consequences, as more countries and stakeholders include metabarcoding as a standard biomonitoring protocol [ 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, morphological identification is timeconsuming and expertise-demanding, making it costly and unpractical, particularly for largescale surveys. Recently, the metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) samples have provided new insights into biodiversity and ecological distribution of numerous taxonomic groups and offer an alternative to the traditional morphology-based approach [28][29][30] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, stakeholders call for guidelines and/or standards to accompany the deployment of the method for biomonitoring purposes (Blancher et al 2022). General guidelines have been recently published, providing best-practices for many applications of DNA metabarcoding (Bruce et al 2021;Pawlowski et al 2021), representing an important milestone. However, guidelines need to be even more precise to be easily and reliably handled by the operators in a variety of contexts.…”
Section: Towards a Standardised And User-friendly Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%