“…Each microcosm was amended with ( 15 NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (99% at., Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)) at a final concentration of 50 nmol L -1 , which was used in order to be close to 10% of ambient concentration and avoid over enrichment (Conde et al, 2000;Aubriot et al, 2005). Incubations were run at the in situ temperature (15°C) in a circulating water bath under PAR intensity of 689 µmol m -2 s -1 and subsamples were taken at 0, 0.5, 2 and 4 h. The short incubation times were chosen according to previous studies on site (Piccini et al, 2009;Alonso et al, 2013) considering the bacterial activity and its dynamics as well as to prevent the effect of confinement on bacterial growth as it has been reported (Fergusson et al, 1984;Fuchs et al, 2000). Water samples from LW treatment were size-fractioned post-incubation using 1.2 µm glass fiber filters (GF/C Whatman Inc., Florham Park, NJ, USA) to retain most of the phytoplankton community (phytoplankton-enriched fraction, PHYTO) Vidal et al, 2007); the resulting filtrate was passed through 0.5 µm glass fiber filters (GE Water & Process Technologies, Boulder, CO, USA) to get the bacterioplankton community (bacteria-enriched fraction, BACT).…”