2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
156
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 406 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
156
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lin and Hong [34] evaluated the operational performance of 20 major airports around the world using the DEA model. Chang et al [35] and Chung et al [36] analyzed the environmental and energy efficiency of China's transportation sector and maximize the energy-saving potential of the transportation sector in China's 30 administrative regions. However, little of this research in the transportation sector considers changes over longer time scales, and contained few analyses of spatial scales.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin and Hong [34] evaluated the operational performance of 20 major airports around the world using the DEA model. Chang et al [35] and Chung et al [36] analyzed the environmental and energy efficiency of China's transportation sector and maximize the energy-saving potential of the transportation sector in China's 30 administrative regions. However, little of this research in the transportation sector considers changes over longer time scales, and contained few analyses of spatial scales.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the two methods arises because the former adopts the geometric means of the distance functions, whereas the latter uses the arithmetic means of the distances in two periods. Many recent studies have noted that the results based on the Luenberger index are more robust than those based on the Malmquist index [26], and Chang et al [27] have made a further improvement by applying a non-radial Luenberger index. This approach was widely applied in later studies to model environmentally sensitive productivity [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, they concluded that the modal split in favor of rail transport will provide energy savings and CO2 emission reductions. Chang et al [38] presented a SBM-DEA model to assess environmental efficiency in the transport sector in China, and they stated that the application of a slacks-based measure (SBM) may help reveal the real energy consumption process. Zhou et al [39] applied the DEA approach to measure the energy efficiency performance of the transport sector in China at the provincial level, and they considered non-energy and energy inputs as well as desirable and undesirable outputs to maximize the energy-saving potential of the transport sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi et al [35] adopted a slacks-based DEA model to evaluate the energy efficiency of China's thermal power generation, with SO2, NOX and soot considered undesirable outputs. In addition, the super DEA model [36], range-adjusted measure (RAM)-DEA model [37], non-radial DEA model [34,38] and DEA-Malmquist model [29,32] have also been also employed to explore energy efficiency issues in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%