Environmental, Human Health and Socio-Economic Effects of Cement Powders: The Multicriteria Analysis as Decisional Methodology

Abstract

The attention to sustainability-related issues has grown fast in recent decades. The experience gained with these themes reveals the importance of considering this topic in the construction industry, which represents an important sector throughout the world. This work consists on conducting a multicriteria analysis of four cement powders, with the objective of calculating and analysing the environmental, human health and socio-economic effects of their production processes. The economic, technical, environmental and safety performances of the examined powders result from official, both internal and public, documents prepared by the producers. The Analytic Hierarchy Process permitted to consider several indicators (i.e., environmental, human health related and socio-economic parameters) and to conduct comprehensive and unbiased analyses which gave the best, most sustainable cement powder. As assumed in this study, the contribution of each considered parameter to the overall sustainability has a different incidence, therefore the procedure could be used to support on-going sustainability efforts under different conditions. The results also prove that it is not appropriate to regard only one parameter to identify the ‘best’ cement powder, but several impact categories should be considered and analysed if there is an interest for pursuing different, often conflicting interests.

A Methodology to Evaluate Accessibility to Bus Stops as a Contribution to Improve Sustainability in Urban Mobility

“…12-15) for the consistency ratio calculation. To make the weighing criteria as much objective as possible [48], a questionnaire was submitted to a panel of 41 students, experts, and academicians in the field of transportation studies (it should be noted that the prerequisite for participating in the weight assessment was respondents' status as regular transit users). Each respondent was asked to fill in the questionnaire by comparing each couple of indicators and stating preferences according to the 1 to 5 scale.…”

Comprehensive Sustainability Evaluation of High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction Projects Based on Unascertained Measure and Analytic Hierarchy Process

“…The current evaluation methods include analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [26][27][28], neural network [29], fuzzy mathematics [27,30,31], multi-criteria decision analysis [32,33], fault tree analysis [34], visco-elastic model [35], transfer function [36], finite element [37], etc. Most of these approaches tackle a single aspect of sustainable development.…”

“…Alternatives and criteria can be ranked based on the overall aggregated weights in matrices. The alternative with the highest overall weight would be the most preferable [28,54]. Based on this first index's judgment matrix, the weights of every first grade index can be calculated by the geometric calculation method of mean.…”

Life Cycle Analysis of Road Construction and Use

“…Since the early 2000s, some research has used the life cycle assessment methodology to assess the environmental performances of a road and its different stages. With different analysis periods and functional units, they examined the environmental impacts of road materials [16][17][18][19][20] and compared construction techniques and maintenance activities [10,[21][22][23][24][25] with different methods and software. Marzouk et al [21] used the software Copert 4 [26] to assess the overall environmental impacts and primary energy associated with earthwork and pavement processes.…”