1990
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(90)90274-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impact of an acid-iron effluent on macrobenthic and meiofaunal assemblages of the St. Lawrence River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The communities of larger animals (macrofauna) frequently fail to provide suitable and sufficient data to asses effects; the distribution of the organisms can be too patchy (mean-to-variance ratios small), their densities too low, or the animals are simply too mobile to examine and monitor impacts reliably. In response to this, in the past 20 years, many pollution ecologists have turned to the meiofauna ( ). These microscopic animals live in the spaces between sediment or soil particles and can be defined as those organisms that will pass through a 1 mm mesh sieve but are retained on a 38 μm sieve (see refs 10−13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communities of larger animals (macrofauna) frequently fail to provide suitable and sufficient data to asses effects; the distribution of the organisms can be too patchy (mean-to-variance ratios small), their densities too low, or the animals are simply too mobile to examine and monitor impacts reliably. In response to this, in the past 20 years, many pollution ecologists have turned to the meiofauna ( ). These microscopic animals live in the spaces between sediment or soil particles and can be defined as those organisms that will pass through a 1 mm mesh sieve but are retained on a 38 μm sieve (see refs 10−13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%