2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
117
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
117
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Galeotti et al, 2009;He and Richard, 2010;Hamit-Haggar, 2012;Apergis, 2016). However, it is inconsistent with the findings by Day and Grafton (2003) Table 6.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Galeotti et al, 2009;He and Richard, 2010;Hamit-Haggar, 2012;Apergis, 2016). However, it is inconsistent with the findings by Day and Grafton (2003) Table 6.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Ajmi, Hammoudeh, Nguyen, and Sato () consider annual data from 1960 to 2010 – per capita energy consumption, economic development (real GDP per capita) and CO₂ emissions – for the G7 countries excluding Germany, and claim the non‐existence of the EKC since they find evidence of cubic N‐shaped (UK) and inverted N‐shaped (Italy and Japan) relationships between CO₂ emissions and real GDP per capita. Apergis () uses panel and time‐series based methods of cointegration for a dataset of EU13 countries from 1960 to 2013. The empirical results are mixed with both panel and time‐series techniques.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in contrast to the existing literature (see for example Omri et al , ) it utilizes the appropriate ‘second generation’ panel unit root tests in order to uncover possible cointegrated relationships, an issue that has been overlooked by the existing empirical literature on EKC. The reason for using this kind of unit root testing can be justified by the fact that traditional stationarity tests (known as ‘first generation’ tests) suffer from size distortions and ignorance of CD (Apergis, ). The empirical findings do indicate that local (NO x per capita emissions) and global pollutants (CO 2 per capita emissions) redefine the validity of the EKC hypothesis when we account for the presence of financial development indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%