2022
DOI: 10.1111/eve.13611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental organic pollutants in hair samples from sport horses

Abstract: Background: Previous studies have shown high levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and their risks in humans and domestic animals, especially in cats and dogs. However, studies regarding the levels of POPs in horses are limited. Objectives: To study the concentration of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organophosphate pesticides (OPs) in hair samples collected from 52 sport horses in Turkey and to investigate the possible r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large matrix effects have been reported by the US Department of Agriculture in residue analysis at low spike concentration (with 50–150 % recoveries) which cannot be entirely removed by cleanup procedures (Dana Ayu Mustofa et al, 2022). Unusual recoveries of 200.54 % from hair samples [ 72 ], 15–144 % from owl feathers [ 73 ], 5, 9, 36 % [ 74 ], 172.6, 169.3, 180.9, 140.7, and 167.3 %, which was thought to be mostly caused by the significant variances between the soils [ 75 ], and 69–140, 8.2–41.6 from soil [ 76 ], have been recorded. Several recovery techniques are reported ( Table 1 ), such as procedural blank, spiked blank, spiked sample, and surrogate recovery among others.…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large matrix effects have been reported by the US Department of Agriculture in residue analysis at low spike concentration (with 50–150 % recoveries) which cannot be entirely removed by cleanup procedures (Dana Ayu Mustofa et al, 2022). Unusual recoveries of 200.54 % from hair samples [ 72 ], 15–144 % from owl feathers [ 73 ], 5, 9, 36 % [ 74 ], 172.6, 169.3, 180.9, 140.7, and 167.3 %, which was thought to be mostly caused by the significant variances between the soils [ 75 ], and 69–140, 8.2–41.6 from soil [ 76 ], have been recorded. Several recovery techniques are reported ( Table 1 ), such as procedural blank, spiked blank, spiked sample, and surrogate recovery among others.…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the temperature was increased by 4 °C/min to 240 °C and then by 60 °C/min to 300 °C” [ 413 ] Hunan Hair 14 0.011–1.38 Int std: 83-180 GC-MS: “The column temperature was initially held at 70 °C for 2 min, raised to 150 °C at the rate of 25 °C/min, then to 200 °C at the rate of 3 °C/min, and to 280 at a rate of 8C, held for 10 min, finally to 300 °C at the rate of 100 °C/min, held at final temperature for 5 min. Total analysis time was 47.067 min” [ 289 ] Hair, liver Liver: 0.01–0.11; hair: 0.14–1.4 Liver:0.1–0.50; hair: 0.1–10 Liver: 74–119; hair: 61- 12 <20 % GC-QqQ-MS/MS [ 414 ] Hair of wild cat 10 0.01–0.5 94–110 <10 GC-ECD: Splitless, “100 °C (1 min), 10 °C/min to 240 °C (1 min), 3 °C/min to 260 °C (1 min), 20 °C/min to 300 °C (10 min)” [ 415 ] Hair 7 0.01–0.1 0.02–0.38 2.51–200.54 GC-MS: “The starting temperature was 60 °C, held for 1 min, ramped to190°Cat40 °C/min, ramped to 280°Cat5°C/min, held for2 minutes, ramped to 290°Cat10 °C/min and held for 5 min” [ 72 ] a = values not converted. …”
Section: Results and Discussion: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%