2017
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental stress correlates with increases in both genetic and residual variances: A meta-analysis of animal studies

Abstract: Adaptive evolutionary responses are determined by the strength of selection and amount of genetic variation within traits, however, both are known to vary across environmental conditions. As selection is generally expected to be strongest under stressful conditions, understanding how the expression of genetic variation changes across stressful and benign environmental conditions is crucial for predicting the rate of adaptive change. Although theory generally predicts increased genetic variation under stress, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
97
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(160 reference statements)
10
97
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in the strength of additive genetic (co)variance in poorer environments might occur because stressful environments induce effects of alleles that are suppressed under normal conditions and increase the expression of cryptic genetic (co)variance (McGuigan and Sgro ; Paaby and Rockman ). Our results, which show opposite trends to those found in previous research, might also imply that the effect of stress on genetic covariances varies as a function of the trait type (e.g., Rowiński and Rogell ). As discussed above, we suggest that the strength of genetic covariances among traits subject to the asset protection principle (Clark ) can be stronger in a favorable environment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the strength of additive genetic (co)variance in poorer environments might occur because stressful environments induce effects of alleles that are suppressed under normal conditions and increase the expression of cryptic genetic (co)variance (McGuigan and Sgro ; Paaby and Rockman ). Our results, which show opposite trends to those found in previous research, might also imply that the effect of stress on genetic covariances varies as a function of the trait type (e.g., Rowiński and Rogell ). As discussed above, we suggest that the strength of genetic covariances among traits subject to the asset protection principle (Clark ) can be stronger in a favorable environment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These less variable climate conditions contribute to low intraspecific variability of traits in a species’ environmental optimum (Albert et al, 2010). Accordingly, the lowland populations of A. montana with higher climate variability (e.g., with higher temperatures and a heterogeneous precipitation regime) showed a higher variability of traits than upland populations, triggered by phenotypic adjustments of these traits (Rowiński & Rogell, 2017⁠⁠; Woods et al, 1999). This stresses their hereby revealed adaptive capacity to buffer negative impacts of climate change (Luo et al, 2019; Wellstein et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus think it credible to conclude that dietary macronutrient content alters biological heterogeneity in a way that affects among-individual variation in age at death. There is a large literature on extreme, or 'stressful', environments as a source of phenotypic variation [39]. The field has tended to focus on the role that the environment plays in releasing hidden genetic variation [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%