Environmentalists NGOs and the construction of the culprit: semiotic analysis

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to analyse how environmentalist NGOs build the figures of guilty and evil businesses in texts published on the web sites of two ironic prizes. These texts are good examples of criticism based on reversing and analysing semiotic productions of organisations, like advertising and environmental reports, as a part of on‐line environmentalist campaigns.Design/methodology/approachThe article is based on textual semiotics and a semiotic‐based approach to rhetoric; the methodology is qualitative and exploratory. A part of the text published on the web sites of the two ironic prizes (Pinocchio and Angry Mermaid) are analysed in order to identify different models and strategies of criticism.FindingsThe article identifies a series of critical strategies: semantic/paradigmatic, syntagmatic/meta‐textual, referential, narrative and inter‐textual criticisms. It underlines the fact that on‐line criticism is an anti‐ideological semiotic action, which can be compared to some forms of ecological thought. Nonetheless, it is based on some forms of rhetoric and ideology, which can be analysed with semiotic tools.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper presents a qualitative, exploratory analysis of two cases: results cannot be directly generalized, but methodology and findings can be transferred to other cases (epistemological principle of transferability).Practical implicationsMethods and results of this paper can help in enriching research on the rhetoric of environmental communication, and can integrate more quantitative approaches. Results can suggest new approaches to business communicators, in order to avoid environmental criticism and “boomerang effects”.Originality/valueThe attempt to apply semiotics to the analysis of communication campaigns is rare and perhaps quite innovative. The approach can enrich the fields of PR and business communication studies, of rhetoric analysis and of environmental communication analysis.

Institutional dynamics and organizations affecting the adoption of sustainable development in the United Kingdom and Brazil

“…These were reflected in different institutional contexts and forces in the light of the framework compiled in Figure . Following Catellani (), the analysis has examined how directions and strategies were described and how different narratives were structured.…”

Pro-nuclear European discourses: Socio-semiotic observations

“…In this way, socio-semiotics can become one voice in a complex interdisciplinary approach to public relations and communication activities as social phenomena. As in previous papers (Catellani, 2010, 2011, 2011b), I have particularly underlined a specific dimension of socio-semiotics, that is the consideration of rhetoric as the discursive effective representation of tensions, negotiation and interaction of different elements (opinions, enunciations, ideological positions, etc.). This discursive space of tension, conflict and relation is in interaction with external social, political and economic dynamics: it acts on them but is also a result of them.…”

Pressões institucionais na evidenciação dos controles das emissões de carbono das empresas de óleo e gás

“…The codes were merged together and split where possible to get more meaning about the phenomenon (Corbin and Strauss, 2014). Following Catellani (2011), the analysis examined how directions and strategies were described and how different narratives were structured.…”