2021
DOI: 10.1177/10422587211026872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Envisioning Entrepreneurship’s Future: Introducing Me-Search and Research Agendas

Abstract: The future of the field of entrepreneurship is bright primarily because of the many research opportunities to make a difference. However, as scholars how can we find these opportunities and choose the ones most likely to contribute to the literature? This essay introduces me-search and a special issue of research-agenda papers from leading scholars as tools for blazing new trails in entrepreneurship research. Me-search and the agenda papers point to the importance of solving a practical problem; problematizing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two collaborative pathways complement Shepherd et al’s (2021) inward-looking approach, whereby entrepreneurship researchers should frame agendas for impact by engaging with a ‘me-search', that is, “scholarly attention on the future based on one’s personal experiences” (p. 956). The problem formulation pathway we label as “inward-looking” aligns with this take on research opportunities based on the personal interests and experience of the researcher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two collaborative pathways complement Shepherd et al’s (2021) inward-looking approach, whereby entrepreneurship researchers should frame agendas for impact by engaging with a ‘me-search', that is, “scholarly attention on the future based on one’s personal experiences” (p. 956). The problem formulation pathway we label as “inward-looking” aligns with this take on research opportunities based on the personal interests and experience of the researcher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notably, we offer two alternative pathways that can be integrated into the methodological toolkit of entrepreneurship researchers. These two pathways complement Shepherd et al’s (2021) inward-looking approach, whereby entrepreneurship researchers should frame agendas for impact by engaging with one’s personal experiences, what they call “me-search.” Second, our study contributes to the literature on research impact (Kieser et al, 2015) by describing problem formulation as processual and collaborative. Whereas prior research focuses on the static attributes of a relevant problem or singularly focuses on the role of researchers in defining such problem (Avenier & Cajaiba, 2012; Van de Ven, 2007), we describe problem formulation as a process of continuous interaction between researchers and practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It describes a fuzzy boundary between the classical and quantum worlds where no certainty exists yet (Monroe et al, 1996). resources on hand, entrepreneurs work on the available means and resources to create new opportunistic ends incrementally and experimentally (Alvarez & Barney, 2007;Foss & Klein, 2020;Shepherd et al, 2021). Effectuation is closely associated with the creation approach.…”
Section: Epistemological Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an intrinsic interest in an issue that the researcher finds intriguing, engaging and fascinating will be crucial for sustaining the intensive effort over a long period (Tsui et al. , 2007; Shepherd et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Interestingness As An Important Part Of Scholarly Conversati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research takes time, as an article may take a couple of years to complete, while a PhD thesis requires even more time. Thus, an intrinsic interest in an issue that the researcher finds intriguing, engaging and fascinating will be crucial for sustaining the intensive effort over a long period (Tsui et al, 2007;Shepherd et al, 2021). The oppositea research project that the researcher does not find interestingoften turns out to be a self-inflicted torture, the reason for unfinished papers and dissertations and failure to build a sustainable research profile over the course of one's career.…”
Section: Interestingness In Researchwhat Do We Know?mentioning
confidence: 99%