2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic Kinetic Isotope Effects from Path-Integral Free Energy Perturbation Theory

Abstract: Path-integral free energy perturbation (PI-FEP) theory is presented to directly determine the ratio of quantum mechanical partition functions of different isotopologs in a single simulation. Furthermore, a double averaging strategy is used to carry out the practical simulation, separating the quantum mechanical path integral exactly into two separate calculations, one corresponding to a classical molecular dynamics simulation of the centroid coordinates, and another involving free-particle path-integral sampli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 51 We have developed an interaction energy decomposition scheme to divide the total electrostatic component of the Δ E Xs tr term ( eq 5 ) into permanent electrostatic (or vertical) interaction and polarization terms: 51 , 62 , 72 where the vertical interaction term E Xs o is the energy of transfer for the solute, obtained by keeping its wave function and charge density strictly the same as in the gas phase at the same molecular geometry: Equation 8 is equivalent to the first-order perturbation energy obtained by treating the solute–solvent interaction Hamiltonian as an external perturbation to the gas-phase wave function. 51 , 62 The remaining energy contributions all involve changes in the solute wave function due to intermolecular interactions and are collectively called polarization energy. The polarization term ( eq 9 ) includes a net gain in interaction energy ( ) and a work penalty needed to distort the solute wave function ( ) to create charge (polarization).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 51 We have developed an interaction energy decomposition scheme to divide the total electrostatic component of the Δ E Xs tr term ( eq 5 ) into permanent electrostatic (or vertical) interaction and polarization terms: 51 , 62 , 72 where the vertical interaction term E Xs o is the energy of transfer for the solute, obtained by keeping its wave function and charge density strictly the same as in the gas phase at the same molecular geometry: Equation 8 is equivalent to the first-order perturbation energy obtained by treating the solute–solvent interaction Hamiltonian as an external perturbation to the gas-phase wave function. 51 , 62 The remaining energy contributions all involve changes in the solute wave function due to intermolecular interactions and are collectively called polarization energy. The polarization term ( eq 9 ) includes a net gain in interaction energy ( ) and a work penalty needed to distort the solute wave function ( ) to create charge (polarization).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Equation (9) can be directly used in path integral molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations, in practice, the increased computational costs severely limit the capability of sufficient sampling of phase space. This becomes a major problem for biological systems to compute kinetic and equilibrium isotope effects of enzymatic processes [ 21 , 28 ]. There are two main reasons for this challenge if Equation (9) was directly used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we obtain directly the ratio of the mass-dependent partition functions, i.e., the equilibrium constant, between the heavy ( H ) and light ( L ) isotopologues: where is the difference in the quantum-mechanical ( qm ) effective potential [ 19 ] between the light and heavy isotopes, indicates an ensemble average over the potential for species L , and with being Boltzmann’s constant and the absolute temperature. We emphasize that the present path integral simulations are carried out for one isotopologue [ 17 , 20 , 21 ]—typically the most abundant one—which is the light particle of oxygen ( 16 O) in the present study (of course, there is no difference if one chooses to carry out the simulation using the heavy particle). Note also that “ L ” and “ H ” in Equation (2) are not limited to a single isotope exchange, but multiple substitutions of different atoms can be simultaneously treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) through a single simulation, as [35] first described in [34]. This procedure relies on the use of free energy perturbation (FEP) theory [36] to treat the mass of the proton (H) as a perturbation variable to the heavier isotope (D) in path integral sampling (see below):…”
Section: Isotope Effects From Path Integral-free Energy Perturbation Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%