1992
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(92)90180-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic release of phosphate in sediments of various origins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Feuillade & Dorioz (1992) detected only small concentrations of phytasehydrolysable P in lake sediments, although this may have been an artefact of the high pH (7.8) used in these experiments (phytase activity decreases to almost zero at pH 7). In the marine environment, White & Miller (1976) demonstrated the presence of small amounts of IP 6 in coastal sediments, whilst Suzumura & Kamatani (1993) detected myo-, chiro-and scyllo-IP 6 in shallow marine sediments from Tokyo Bay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In contrast, Feuillade & Dorioz (1992) detected only small concentrations of phytasehydrolysable P in lake sediments, although this may have been an artefact of the high pH (7.8) used in these experiments (phytase activity decreases to almost zero at pH 7). In the marine environment, White & Miller (1976) demonstrated the presence of small amounts of IP 6 in coastal sediments, whilst Suzumura & Kamatani (1993) detected myo-, chiro-and scyllo-IP 6 in shallow marine sediments from Tokyo Bay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This fraction was mostly enzymatically hydrolyzable (69-95%). This has important implications for the transfer of P into waterways and the risk of eutrophication because most of the enzymes used in this study are present in natural aquatic ecosystems (21,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Figure 3 shows the relative contribution of EHP and DRP to TDP, illustrating the importance of EHP as a potential source of available P, which is usually not considered when measuring the bioavailable P fraction.…”
Section: Dop Speciation In Wastewater Liquorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EHP fraction represented only 21% of the DOP. However, because most of the enzymes used in this study exist in natural aquatic ecosystems (21,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) and DOP represented 76% of TDP, the EHP fraction may finally represent a source of available P of similar magnitude to DRP (Figure 3). This result emphasizes the importance of the EHP pool as a source of available P which can feed the water column via diffusion through the sediment-water interface and, hence, potentially increase the risk of eutrophication.…”
Section: Dop Speciation In Wastewater Liquorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These enzymes, most notably alkaline phosphatase (APase), 5Ј-nucleotidases and phosphodiesterases, catalyze hydrolysis of phosphoester bonds in phosphomonoesters (ATP, sugar-PO 4 , polyphosphates), and phosphodiesters (RNA, DNA), and belong to the class of enzymes called phosphohydrolases (Walsh, 1979;Ammerman, 1991). Phosphohydrolases are common to natural waters and sediments where they are involved in the degradation of organic matter and regeneration of P i to the water column (Ammerman and Azam, 1985;Feuillade and Dorioz, 1992;Siuda and Güde, 1994;Hoppe and Ulrich, 1999). Hydrolysis of most P org compounds occurs extracellulary, that is, outside of the cell cytoplasm, either in the periplasmic space located between the outer cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane of gram negative bacteria, or completely external to the cell in the surrounding medium.…”
Section: Microbial P Metabolism and Phosphoenzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%