2000
DOI: 10.1094/phyto.2000.90.5.522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Testing of Shoots Grown In Vitro and the Use of Immunocapture-Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Improve the Detection of Prunus necrotic ringspot virus in Rose

Abstract: We developed and evaluated two different methods to improve the detection of the most prevalent virus of rose in Europe, Prunus necrotic ring-spot virus (PNRSV). Immunocapture-reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was estimated to be about 100 times more sensitive than double-antibody sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) and showed an equivalent specificity. Based on the observation that PNRSV multiplies actively in young growing tissues (axillary shoots and cuttings), an in vitro c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IC‐RT‐PCR nested PCR should have circumvented the occurrence of potential interference in amplifications (Olmos et al., 1999). Inconsistencies in IC‐RT‐PCR have been mentioned by other authors (Spiegel et al., 1996; Moury et al., 2000), that improved the assay performances by adding extra steps such as further hybridization with nucleic acid probes. In the present study problems were also observed in detecting IC‐RT‐PCR products (data not shown) that might have been due to lower stability of viral RNA and the addition of RNase inhibitors may have been beneficial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IC‐RT‐PCR nested PCR should have circumvented the occurrence of potential interference in amplifications (Olmos et al., 1999). Inconsistencies in IC‐RT‐PCR have been mentioned by other authors (Spiegel et al., 1996; Moury et al., 2000), that improved the assay performances by adding extra steps such as further hybridization with nucleic acid probes. In the present study problems were also observed in detecting IC‐RT‐PCR products (data not shown) that might have been due to lower stability of viral RNA and the addition of RNase inhibitors may have been beneficial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though this technique is highly sensitive and specific, it turns out to be impractical because of the effort involved in making a large number of simultaneous analyses, and also because PCR testing is rather costly. Analyzing many samples at the same time is possible through serological techniques such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); it has been shown, however, that they are not as sensitive as molecular testing (Stevens et al, 1997;Sanchez-Navarro et al, 1998;Moury et al, 2000;Lunello et al, 2005). Molecular hybridization probes are an interesting alternative for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from almond, apricot, peach, plum, sour-and sweet-cherry trees, roses are also attacked by this virus (Németh 1986). PNRSV is the most commonly found rose virus in the United Kingdom, France and Poland (Thomas 1981(Thomas , 1984aMoury et al 2000Moury et al , 2001Paduch-Cichal 2003). Some field-grown rose cultivars show no symptoms of PNRSV infection, whereas others develop line patterns, ringspots or yellow nets on leaves (Thomas 1981(Thomas , 1984aCurtis and Moran 1986;Wong and Horst 1988;Paduch-Cichal 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%