IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2002.1026209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral aggregation and comparison with EO-1 Advanced Land Imager and Landsat 7 ETM+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of simulated HyspIRI bands for any hyperspectral models provides valuable information for next generation hyperspectral sensors from which users will have to extract appropriate optimal wavebands relevant for their application, or, as an alternative, they could carry specialized optimal sensors with selective wavebands, focusing on gathering data for targeted applications [34]. Therefore, we simulated Hyperion, CHRIS and HyspIRI spectral bands by using a Gaussian spectral response function on the field R rs data [34][35][36]. For the Hyperion spectral bandwidth simulation, we used the bands centered at: 599.8, 609.97, 620.15, 650.67, 701.55, 711.72 and 721.9 nm.…”
Section: Sensor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of simulated HyspIRI bands for any hyperspectral models provides valuable information for next generation hyperspectral sensors from which users will have to extract appropriate optimal wavebands relevant for their application, or, as an alternative, they could carry specialized optimal sensors with selective wavebands, focusing on gathering data for targeted applications [34]. Therefore, we simulated Hyperion, CHRIS and HyspIRI spectral bands by using a Gaussian spectral response function on the field R rs data [34][35][36]. For the Hyperion spectral bandwidth simulation, we used the bands centered at: 599.8, 609.97, 620.15, 650.67, 701.55, 711.72 and 721.9 nm.…”
Section: Sensor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the details of the regions of Datasets II and III, we selected a small area enclosed by rectangles in Figs [14][15][16]. Interpretation of each group of images in Figs.…”
Section: A Comparison Between Spectra-enhanced and Real Data By Visumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a massive amount of accumulated MS data has been collected around the world, and these MS data usually have higher spatial and time resolution and a wider swath than HS data. For example, MS images captured by the Advanced Land Imager (ALI) (also carried on EO-1) have the same spatial resolution as Hyperion products, but have a swath of 37 km, and the images captured by the Landsat Thematic Mapper 5/Enhanced Thematic Mapper (TM/ETM+) have a swath of 185 km [15], [16]. As the Landsat satellites and EO-1 satellite operate on the same track, the HS or MS sensors onboard can obtain data from the same location with a very small time difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral data has been considered in remote sensing to crosscalibrate a hyperspectral sensor with another hyperspectral or multispectral sensor (Teillet et al, 2001), and to simulate data of future sensors (Barry et al, 2002). The algorithm exploits sensor simulation capabilities of hyperspectral data using spectral response function of the sensor to be simulated.…”
Section: Generating Simulated Multispectral (Sms) Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods directly convolve the multispectral filter functions to the hyperspectral data (Green and Shimada, 1997), which is equivalent to using the values of the multispectral SRF as the weighting factors. Some have used the integral of the product of the hyperspectral and multispectral SRFs as the weight (Barry et al, 2002). Few have calculated the weights by finding the least square approximation of a multispectral SRF by a linear combination of the hyperspectral SRFs ( Slawomir Blonksi, Gerald Blonksi, Jeffrey Blonksi, Robert Ryan, Greg Terrie, Vicki Zanoni, 2001).…”
Section: Generating Simulated Multispectral (Sms) Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%