2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epicardial adipose tissue volume but not density is an independent predictor for myocardial ischemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
39
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, case-control studies identified pericardial fat volume as a strong predictor of myocardial ischemia (113,305). By contrast, some studies did not find such an association between EAT and the extent of CAD in intermediate to high risk patients, suggesting that the relationship is not constant at more advanced stages (263,306).…”
Section: Histological and Radiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, case-control studies identified pericardial fat volume as a strong predictor of myocardial ischemia (113,305). By contrast, some studies did not find such an association between EAT and the extent of CAD in intermediate to high risk patients, suggesting that the relationship is not constant at more advanced stages (263,306).…”
Section: Histological and Radiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies highlighted the add-on predictive value of EAT compared to CAD scores such as coronary calcium score (CAC) (113,138,173). EAT significantly correlated with the extent and severity of CAD, chest pain, unstable angina and coronary flow reserve (233,269).…”
Section: Histological and Radiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 9 ] Peri-coronary fat attenuation varies depending on its location,[ 10 ] however, clinical implications of EAT attenuation remain controversial. [ 9 , 11 ] In the present manuscript, we aimed to (1) determine the distribution of CT-derived EAT volume and attenuation as well as their correlation in a retrospective clinical cohort of patients undergoing cardiac CT imaging, (2) investigate the association of EAT volume and attenuation with established risk factors as well as antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy, and (3) determine the association of EAT volume and attenuation with the clinical presentation of the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in 609 asymptomatic low-risk to intermediate-risk patients, Abazid et al 45 observed a negative correlation between EAT attenuation and coronary calcification independent of EAT volume. In contrast, in a cross-sectional analysis of patients with acute MI and stable CAD controls, Mahabadi et al 27 observed a positive association between EAT attenuation and type I acute MI, while Hell et al 35 did not report a link between EAT attenuation and myocardial ischaemia on SPECT. These contradicting results may be explained by a small sample size, the variable nature of the study population, as well as methodological limitations, such as selection bias, reverse causality and the presence of confounders that were not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…33 These general population cohorts composed of asymptomatic low-risk subjects demonstrated that EAT volume (measured on non-contrast CT scans) was associated with the presence of ischaemic heart disease,29 incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events,32 coronary calcification28 30 and calcium progression 31. Furthermore, among participants recruited from hospital registries with low to intermediate cardiovascular risk (reflecting the current indications for cardiac CT), higher EAT volumes were positively associated with the presence of coronary stenosis,34 myocardial ischaemia,35 calcified,36 non-calcified coronary plaques,37 as well as high-risk plaque features, such as low-attenuation plaque and thin fibrous cap. However, in the CORE320 (Coronary Artery Evaluation using 320-row Multidetector CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion) study, Tanami et al 38 did not find an independent association between EAT volume and either obstructive CAD, myocardial ischaemia on single photon-emission CT (SPECT) or coronary calcification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%