Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary

Abstract

Background Implantable medical devices (IMDs) are medical instruments embedded inside the body. Well-informed and empowered patients living with IMDs are key players of improving IMD-related patient safety and health outcomes. However, little is known about IMD patients’ epidemiology, characteristics, and current awareness levels. Our primary aim was to investigate the point and lifetime prevalence of patients living with IMDs. Patients’ IMD-related knowledge and determinants of IMDs’ impact on their life were also explored. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was conducted. Respondents’ IMD history, whether they received instructions for use and IMD’s overall impact on life were recorded by self-reports. Patients’ knowledge about living with IMDs was assessed on visual analogue scales (VAS, 0–10). Shared decision-making was analyzed by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons between IMD wearers were performed for statistical differences. Significant determinants of IMD’s overall impact on life were examined in linear regression analysis. Results In the total sample (N = 1400, mean age 58.1 ±11.1; female 53.7%), nearly one third of respondents were living with IMD (30.9%; 433/1400). Among them, the most frequent IMDs were tooth implants (30.9%) and intraocular lens (26.8%). Mean knowledge VAS scores were similar (range: 5.5 ±3.8–6.5 ±3.2) but differences by IMD types were observed. Patients who received instructions for use or reported better impact on life indicated higher self-reported knowledge. Regression confirmed that patients’ knowledge was significant predictor of IMD’s impact on life, but this effect was overwritten by the SDM-Q-9. Conclusions This first comprehensive epidemiological study on IMDs provides basic data for public health strategy planning alongside the implementation of MDR. Improved self-perceived outcomes were associated with higher knowledge hence education of patients receiving IMD deserves consideration. We suggest to investigate further the role of shared decision-making on IMD’s overall impact on patients’ life in future prospective studies.

The Impact of Parental Electronic Health Literacy on Disease Management and Outcomes in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Cross-Sectional Clinical Study

“…Pediatric T1DM care has become increasingly technology-driven, with improved therapeutics, such as automated insulin delivery systems and continuous glucose monitoring sensors, being increasingly used in treatment [ 12 - 15 ]. These advanced technologies have a positive effect on disease outcomes as they can facilitate reaching glycemic targets and thus reducing diabetes-related complications [ 16 ].…”

Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed

“…While the number of published SRs in PubMed was 80 per day in 2019 [ 3 ], this number increased to 135 by 2021 [ 4 ]. The accelerated development of novel medical technologies such as software and digital devices [ 5 , 6 ], virtual reality [ 7 ], and chatbots [ 8 ] will push further the demand for high-quality SRs [ 3 , 9 , 10 ]. Beyond medicine, systematic reviews are often performed in disciplines including engineering [ 11 – 13 ] or the social sciences [ 14 , 15 ].…”