Epidemiology of Bovine Leukosis Virus Infection in Some Selected Herds

Rutili, D.; Severini, M.; Titoli, F.; Rampichini, L; Bertorotta, G.

doi:10.1007/978-94-011-9090-9_70

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The incidence increases around first lactation (EFSA AHAW Panel, 2015). (1972)(1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982) 20-34% 12-18% 9.5-18.3% 2.1-5.5% Kaja et al (1984) Australia, dairy herd 42% 24% Dimmock et al (1991) Italy, 9 dairy herds longitudinal study (1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980) 11.0-11.7% 3.9% Rutili et al (1982) Estonia, dairy cattle national population (1989)(1990)(1991)(1992) Parameter 2 -Type of epidemiological occurrence (sporadic, epidemic, endemic) at MS level…”

Section: Speed Of Transmissionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL)

More¹,

Bøtner²,

Butterworth

et al. 2017

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enzootic bovine leucosis (EBL) has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of EBL to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of EBL according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to EBL. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, it is inconclusive whether EBL can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no full consensus on the criteria 5 B(i) and 5 B(iii). Consequently, since it is inconclusive whether EBL can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL, then the assessment on compliance of EBL with the criteria as in Sections 4 and 5 of Annex IV to the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in points (d) and (e) of Article 9(1), and which animal species can be considered to be listed for EBL according to Article 8(3) of the AHL is also inconclusive.

show abstract

Section: Speed Of Transmissionmentioning

confidence: 99%