2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03756.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy in Africa: a systematic review

Abstract: AimTo summarize findings from studies reporting the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic maculopathy in African countries in light of the rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus.MethodsUsing a predefined search strategy, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation index and Conference Proceedings Citation index, African Index Medicus and the grey literature database ‘OpenSIGLE’ for studies published between January 1990 and February 2011. Included studies reported preva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
99
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(175 reference statements)
5
99
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A report published in 1992 from the Ethiopian capital on a mixed urban/rural group of T1DM patients (mainly urban) reported that of the 11.5% of the total group for whom retinal examination was recorded, retinopathy was found in 21.7% of those with disease duration of 0-9 years [23]. A systematic review which included reports from 21 African countries on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy was undertaken recently [3]. Most of the studies included in the report were set up for specific but disparate reasons making it difficult to compare them with the present study: thus, several did not differentiate between T1DM and T2DM, many investigated a small percentage of the total diabetic group or did not state the percentage assessed for retinopathy and maculopathy, and although rural groups were included in a few studies the outcomes for rural and urban groups were not reported separately [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A report published in 1992 from the Ethiopian capital on a mixed urban/rural group of T1DM patients (mainly urban) reported that of the 11.5% of the total group for whom retinal examination was recorded, retinopathy was found in 21.7% of those with disease duration of 0-9 years [23]. A systematic review which included reports from 21 African countries on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy was undertaken recently [3]. Most of the studies included in the report were set up for specific but disparate reasons making it difficult to compare them with the present study: thus, several did not differentiate between T1DM and T2DM, many investigated a small percentage of the total diabetic group or did not state the percentage assessed for retinopathy and maculopathy, and although rural groups were included in a few studies the outcomes for rural and urban groups were not reported separately [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review which included reports from 21 African countries on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy was undertaken recently [3]. Most of the studies included in the report were set up for specific but disparate reasons making it difficult to compare them with the present study: thus, several did not differentiate between T1DM and T2DM, many investigated a small percentage of the total diabetic group or did not state the percentage assessed for retinopathy and maculopathy, and although rural groups were included in a few studies the outcomes for rural and urban groups were not reported separately [3]. In the major T1DM-only study an urban cohort (n=88) from Soweto (South Africa) has been followed from 1982, with the 20 year follow-up published in 2005; in 1982 their average age was 22 years and duration of diabetes was 3 years [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 In Zimbabwe the last study on diabetic retinopathy was done two decades ago (October 1995 to April 1996) in which an overall prevalence of 27.5% was reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without treatment 50% of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy become blind within 5 years. 2 Visual impairment and blindness in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy can be reduced by laser photocoagulation treatment and antivascular endothelial growth factor medicines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%