1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00485.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of Giardiasis in Tasmania: A Potential Risk to Residents and Visitors

Abstract: Giardiasis is endemic in Tasmania and poses a risk to locals as well as to visitors to the state, especially those who participate in wilderness activities such as bushwalking. These people must be aware of the possible risk of Giardia infection and should take precautionary measures to avoid infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our 24.1% prevalence estimate for wild devils was also higher than previous prevalence estimates of Giardia in devils of 8.3% ( n = 12) [24] and 6.0% ( n = 32) [23]. This higher estimate is likely due to the use of molecular techniques in this study, which are more sensitive than faecal flotation methods [47, 48] used in prior studies of Giardia in Tasmanian devils [23, 24]. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our 24.1% prevalence estimate for wild devils was also higher than previous prevalence estimates of Giardia in devils of 8.3% ( n = 12) [24] and 6.0% ( n = 32) [23]. This higher estimate is likely due to the use of molecular techniques in this study, which are more sensitive than faecal flotation methods [47, 48] used in prior studies of Giardia in Tasmanian devils [23, 24]. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Our estimate of prevalence of Giardia in wild Tasmanian devils (24.1%) is higher than prevalence estimates for mainland Australian marsupials (range 1.3–13.8%) [8, 13, 15, 16], but sits within the range of prevalence estimates for Tasmanian marsupials (6.25–61.5%) [46]. Our 24.1% prevalence estimate for wild devils was also higher than previous prevalence estimates of Giardia in devils of 8.3% ( n = 12) [24] and 6.0% ( n = 32) [23]. This higher estimate is likely due to the use of molecular techniques in this study, which are more sensitive than faecal flotation methods [47, 48] used in prior studies of Giardia in Tasmanian devils [23, 24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Giardiasis incidence and spread is thought to be mainly a result of anthroponotic risk factors and transmission [91], [92], [93], [94]. So, the slightly elevated summer highs shown in the USA, UK and Canada may imply increased person-to-person transmission in warmer months as a consequence of outdoor activities [95] and exposure to untreated water sources [96].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most infections in Australia have been controlled it has led to over-confidence regarding their importance (or even existence) today. Unfortunately, while ubiquitous protozoan species have been reported in wildlife across Australia [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] the life cycles, ecology, and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are poorly understood. Much of the work to date has been opportunistic with unreliable funding opportunities, but with modern methods and 'omic' technology [62] offering an avenue for major advances in the field, there is potential for renewed support and interest.…”
Section: Historical Overview Of Tasmania and Parasites Of Medical Impmentioning
confidence: 99%